Skip to content

ACTICOAT FLEX7 4" X 5" 66800405Recalls & reported problems

Smith & Nephew Medical Limited · Silver-coated antimicrobial barrier dressing · Class U

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00040565124339), received between Oct 29, 2020 and Nov 1, 2023 — classified as 2 injuries.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Reaction1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 1, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, AN ACTICOAT FLEX 7 10X12.5CM CTN 5 WAS CUT INTO A STRIP AND USED FOR TUNNELING OF WOUND AS A PACKING MATERIAL. WHEN THE WOUND WAS X-RAYED TO CONFIRM PACKING MATERIAL WAS REMOVED, THE AMOUNT OF ACTICOAT DOCUMENTED IN THE WOUND DID NOT SHOW ON X RAY. THEREFORE THEY HAD TO ORDER A CT SCAN TO CONFIRM IT WAS STILL IN PLACE. IT SHOWED UP ON CT SCAN BUT NOT AN X RAY. PATIENT REQUIRED SURGERY TO REMOVE DRESSING.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18049665 ↗
  • InjuryOct 29, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD ACTICOAT FLEX APPLIED TO LEG WOUND WHICH HAD INSTANT STINGING SENSATION. A RENASYS FOAM DRESSING WAS APPLIED OVER THE TOP AND CONNECTED TO RENASYS DEVICE AT 80MMGH PRESSURE ON CONTINUES SETTING. PATIENT COMPLAINED IT WAS LIKE A CHEMICAL BURNING SENSATION. THE DRESSING WAS IN PLACE FOR 5 MINUTES AND STINGING SENSATION DID NOT SUBSIDE, THEN THE DRESSING WAS REMOVED. THE SEAL BROKE ON RENASYS DRESSING, THIS WAS LEFT FOR 2 MIN AND THEN REMOVED BUT THE WOUND WAS HIGHLY INFLAMED AND SLIGHT BLEEDING BUT NOT ACTIVE. BLEEDING SETTLED QUICKLY. THE ACTICOAT FLEX HAD BEEN USED FOR THE PAST 2 ½ WEEKS PRIORS TO THIS SUSPECTED REACTION. TREATMENT WAS SOLVED BY REPLACING THE DRESSINGS WITH CUTACERIN AND PICO.

    Patient problems: Reaction

    MAUDE report 10754363 ↗

Other Dressing, Wound, Drug devices

All Dressing, Wound, Drug devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page