Skip to content

Insignia 336-0240Recalls & reported problems

Alphatec Spine, Inc. · Insignia, ACP, 2 Level, 40mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Insignia (34)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00190376423517), received between Nov 15, 2024 and Nov 15, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Material Separation1

Patient problems

  • Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 15, 2024Break; Material Separation; Break; Material Separation

    A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMY AND FUSION SPINAL PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT REVISION SURGERY TOOK PLACE DUE TO NON-UNION. AFTER REVISION SURGERY, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE LOCKING MECHANISM HAD BROKEN OFF THE PLATE DURING THE REMOVAL PROCESS.

    Patient problems: Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture

    MAUDE report 20699176 ↗

Other Appliance, fixation, spinal intervertebral body devices

All Appliance, fixation, spinal intervertebral body devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page