Lynx Ultra System M0068503060Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Suprapubic Mid-Urethral Sling · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00191506007676), received between Sep 4, 2025 and Dec 12, 2025 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Advance” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Difficult to Advance1
- Material Integrity Problem1
- Material Split, Cut or Torn1
- Material Twisted/Bent1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Erosion1
- Vascular Dissection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 12, 2025Material Twisted/Bent; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Twisted/Bent; Material Split, Cut or Torn
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A MID-URETHRAL SLING PROCEDURE USING A LYNX ULTRA SYSTEM DEVICE, THE SLING BECAME TANGLED WHILE BEING PULLED THROUGH THE ANATOMY, AND THE MESH APPEARED SHREDDED. THE PHYSICIAN NOTED THAT THE INTEGRITY OF THE MESH APPEARED COMPROMISED AND DID NOT FEEL COMFORTABLE PROCEEDING WITH IMPLANTATION, SO THE SLING WAS REMOVED, RESULTING IN A PROLONGED PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED DISSECTION AND SUPRAPUBIC EXTRUSION. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE OF THE SAME MODEL. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON DECEMBER 15, 2025: THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS. DISSECTION WAS PERFORMED, THEN THE SLING WAS PLACED, BUT THE SLING STRETCHED AND THE PHYSICIAN WASN'T HAPPY WITH IT, SO THE SLING WAS REMOVED. THE ONLY PATIENT IMPACT WAS EXTENDED THE EXTENDED PROCEDURE TIME TO PLACE A SECOND SLING.
Patient problems: Erosion; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; Vascular Dissection
MAUDE report 23792335 ↗MalfunctionSep 4, 2025Difficult to Advance; Material Integrity Problem; Difficult to Advance; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE USING A LYNX ULTRA SYSTEM DEVICE, THE PHYSICIAN ENCOUNTERED DIFFICULTY WITH TROCAR PLACEMENT. THE RIGHT TROCAR APPEARED TO BE POSITIONED TOO CLOSE TO THE BLADDER, REQUIRING THE PHYSICIAN TO REPOSITION THE TROCARS MULTIPLE TIMES. AS A RESULT, THE MESH BECAME DISTORTED. DISSECTION WAS PARTICULARLY DIFFICULT FOR THE PATIENT, WHICH THE PHYSICIAN BELIEVES WAS A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR TO THE DIFFICULTY EXPERIENCED, ALTHOUGH THE PATIENT'S ANATOMY WAS UNREMARKABLE. A SECOND LYNX ULTRA SYSTEM DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22966920 ↗
Other mesh, surgical, synthetic, urogynecologic, for stress urinary incontinence, retropubic or transobturator devices
- GYNECARE TVT 810081Ethicon Sàrl · mesh, surgical, synthetic, urogynecologic, for stress urinary incontinence, retropubic or transobturator629 reports
- GYNECARE TVT EXACT TVTRLEthicon Sàrl · mesh, surgical, synthetic, urogynecologic, for stress urinary incontinence, retropubic or transobturator457 reports
- Advantage Fit™ System M0068502110Boston Scientific Corporation · mesh, surgical, synthetic, urogynecologic, for stress urinary incontinence, retropubic or transobturator451 reports
- GYNECARE TVT 810081LEthicon Sàrl · mesh, surgical, synthetic, urogynecologic, for stress urinary incontinence, retropubic or transobturator371 reports
- GYNECARE TVT 810041BEthicon Sàrl · mesh, surgical, synthetic, urogynecologic, for stress urinary incontinence, retropubic or transobturator362 reports
- Obtryx™ System - Halo M0068505000Boston Scientific Corporation · mesh, surgical, synthetic, urogynecologic, for stress urinary incontinence, retropubic or transobturator288 reports
- Aris 93-4400Coloplast A/S · mesh, surgical, synthetic, urogynecologic, for stress urinary incontinence, retropubic or transobturator215 reports
- Align® TO Trans-Obturator Urethral Support System - Halo BRD500HLC. R. Bard, Inc. · mesh, surgical, synthetic, urogynecologic, for stress urinary incontinence, retropubic or transobturator213 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page