OptiCross™ H749518130Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary Imaging Catheter · Class 2
All models of OptiCross (4)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00191506035396), received between May 6, 2025 and Sep 4, 2026 — classified as 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Air/Gas in Device” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Air/Gas in Device2
- Entrapment of Device2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Difficult to Flush1
- Leak/Splash1
- Poor Quality Image1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 4, 2026Leak/Splash; Air/Gas in Device
It was reported that catheter issue occurred.An OptiCross imaging catheter was selected for the ultrasound examination of the target lesion. During preparation, the technician noticed that the flushing tubing was leaking, which prevented proper air removal. The procedure was completed with another of same device. The patient remained stable after the procedure.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50614139 ↗MalfunctionJan 12, 2026Difficult to Flush; Air/Gas in Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A CATHETER ISSUE OCCURRED. THE OPTICROSS IMAGING CATHETER WAS SELECTED FOR INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION. DURING PREPARATION, THE IVUS CATHETER WAS UNABLE TO BE FLUSHED AND AIR WAS OBSERVED. THE PRODUCT WAS NOT USED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH AN ALTERNATIVE DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AND THE PATIENT FULLY RECOVERED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24048074 ↗MalfunctionOct 22, 2025Poor Quality Image; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Poor Quality Image; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
REPORTABLE BASED ON DEVICE ANALYSIS COMPLETED ON 3OCT2025. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A CATHETER ISSUE OCCURRED. THE OPTICROSS IMAGING CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION OF THE TARGET LESION. DURING AN IMAGE RUN, THERE WAS A SNAP SOUND FOLLOWED BY LOSS OF THE IMAGE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NEW DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS. HOWEVER, DEVICE ANALYSIS REVEALED THE CATHETER WAS TWISTED AND PERFORATED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23356275 ↗MalfunctionJun 24, 2025Entrapment of Device; Entrapment of Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A CATHETER ISSUE OCCURRED. THE 90% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN A NON-TORTUOUS AND CALCIFIED OBTUSE MARGINAL (OM) ARTERY. ATHERECTOMY WAS PERFORMED WITH A 1.5MM BURR. AN OPTICROSS IMAGING CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND (IVUS) EXAMINATION OF THE TARGET LESION OVER A NON-BOSTON SCIENTIFIC (NON-BSC) WIRE. IVUS SHOWED THAT THE CALCIUM HAD BEEN SUFFICIENTLY MODIFIED, AND AFTER A SUCCESSFUL PULLBACK, THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE THE CATHETER OVER THE WIRE. HOWEVER, THE CATHETER COULD NOT BE WITHDRAWN, AND THE WIRE COULD NOT BE ADVANCED FURTHER DOWN THE VESSEL. IT APPEARED THAT THE CATHETER HAD COMPLETELY GRABBED ONTO THE WIRE AND WRAPPED AROUND IT. EVERYTHING HAD TO BE REMOVED AS ONE UNIT. THE VESSEL WAS SUCCESSFULLY REWIRED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22320749 ↗MalfunctionMay 6, 2025Entrapment of Device; Entrapment of Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A CATHETER ISSUE OCCURRED. THE OPTICROSS IMAGING CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION OF THE TARGET LESION. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE CATHETER WRAPPED ITSELF AROUND THE GUIDEWIRE. THE CATHETER AND GUIDEWIRE WERE REPORTED TOGETHER AND THE PROCEDURE COMPLETED USING ANOTHER OPTICROSS. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21969080 ↗
Other Transducer, ultrasonic, diagnostic devices
- Site~Rite 8 Ultrasound System 9770603Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Transducer, ultrasonic, diagnostic620 reports
- ULTRASONIC PROBE UM-S20-17SOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Transducer, ultrasonic, diagnostic2 deaths344 reports
- Transducer X7-2t 989605414122Philips Ultrasound LLC · Transducer, ultrasonic, diagnostic6 recalls21 reports
- EPIQ Diagnostic Ultrasound System 989605488741Philips Ultrasound LLC · Transducer, ultrasonic, diagnostic3 recalls165 reports
- bk3000, bk3500, bk5000, bkActiv 2300Bk Medical Aps · Transducer, Ultrasonic, Diagnostic6 recalls1 report
- Transducer L12-3 989605412072Philips Ultrasound LLC · Transducer, ultrasonic, diagnostic5 recalls1 report
- Transducer eL18-4 EMT 989605431531Philips Ultrasound LLC · Transducer, ultrasonic, diagnostic5 recalls0 reports
- Transducer L12-3 Ergo 989605492481Philips Ultrasound LLC · Transducer, ultrasonic, diagnostic5 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page