Skip to content

AVANOS 40-9228Recalls & reported problems

Avanos Medical, Inc. · CORFLO* Nasogastric/Nasointestinal Feeding Tube with Stylet with ENFit® Connector · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00350770460390), received between Jul 24, 2024 and Aug 7, 2025 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Complete Blockage” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Complete Blockage1
  • Material Puncture/Hole1

Patient problems

  • Cardiac Arrest1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 7, 2025Complete Blockage; Complete Blockage

    IT WAS REPORTED THE NASOGASTRIC "(NG) [TUBE} ON PATIENT WAS BLOCKED, RN'S [REGISTERED NURSES] WERE ATTEMPTING TO UNBLOCK NG. NG WAS ABLE TO BE UNBLOCKED BUT PATIENT WENT UNRESPONSIVE IMMEDIATELY AFTER. CODE BLUE WAS CALLED. APPROXIMATELY 45-MINUTES OF CODE WAS RUN. UPON ARRIVAL TO PICU [PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE CARE UNIT] POST CODE, X-RAY WAS DONE AND NG WAS SHOWN TO BE DEFECTIVEING WAS REMOVED FROM PATIENT, IT WAS NOTED TO HAVE A DEFECT." THE DEVICE WAS ORIGINALLY INSERTED ON (B)(6) AND REMOVED ON (B)(6) DURING THE CRITICAL INCIDENT.

    Patient problems: Cardiac Arrest

    MAUDE report 22744131 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 24, 2024Material Puncture/Hole; Material Puncture/Hole

    IT WAS REPORTED, ¿STAFF ADVISE THIS CATHETER WAS INSERTED INTO A PAEDIATRIC PATIENT BY AN EXPERIENCED STAFF MEMBER, UNDER MEDICAL SUPERVISION. FEEDBACK IS THAT GUIDEWIRE APPEARED TO BE IN CORRECT POSITION PRIOR TO INSERTION AND NO RESISTANCE FELT WHILE INSERTION IN PROGRESS. GUIDEWIRE WAS LEFT IN PLACE IN THE TUBE UNTIL POSITION CHECK POST INSERTION WAS DONE UNDER X-RAY. THE ANOMALY WAS THEN NOTICED BY THE MEDICAL STAFF WHO ASKED FOR IT TO BE PULLED OUT. ONCE NASOGASTRIC (NG) REMOVED, IT WAS CLEAR THE GUIDEWIRE HAD PIERCED THE TUBE. NO EVIDENCE OF PATIENT HARM AS A RESULT OF THIS ANOMALY.¿

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19818036 ↗

Other Tubes, gastrointestinal (and accessories) devices

All Tubes, gastrointestinal (and accessories) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page