Skip to content

AVANOS 94779Recalls & reported problems

Avanos Medical, Inc. · * MIC* G Feeding Tube · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00350770947792), received between Feb 5, 2020 and Jul 24, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Rupture1
  • Pressure Problem1

Patient problems

  • Skin Erosion1
  • Stenosis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 24, 2024Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    AVANOS MEDICAL INC. RECEIVED A REPORT THAT REFERENCED TWO DIFFERENT INCIDENCES, WHICH WERE ASSOCIATED WITH SEPARATE UNITS, INVOLVING THE SAME PATIENT. THIS IS THE FIRST OF TWO REPORTS. REFER TO 9611594-2024-00130 FOR THE SECOND REPORT. IT WAS REPORTED, WHEN PLACED IN THE PATIENT WITH INTRODUCER PLACEMENT KITS (IPK) THE BALLOON BURST AFTER ONE DAY. THEY HAD TO CHANGE IT, KEEPING THE PATIENT IN THE HOSPITAL FOR ONE MORE DAY DUE TO THE CLOSING OF THE STOMA. IT WAS NECESSARY TO GIVE MORE MEDICINES TO THE PATIENT AND CHANGE FOR A NEW PERCUTANEOUS GASTROSTOMY SOME DAYS AFTER. PER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 4JUL2024, THE FIRST PROCEDURE WITH THE WITH INTRODUCER PLACEMENT KITS (IPK) OCCURRED ON (B)(6) 2024. THE BALLOON BURST ON (B)(6) 2024 AND WAS UNABLE TO BE REPLACED DUE TO STOMA CLOSURE. ON (B)(6) 2024, A NEW MIC FEEDING TUBE WAS PLACED WITH THE SAME INTRODUCER PLACEMENT KITS (IPK) TECHNIQUE.

    Patient problems: Stenosis

    MAUDE report 19818064 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 5, 2020Pressure Problem; Pressure Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THE ENTERAL FEEDING TUBE LEAKED CAUSING SKIN BREAKDOWN, "THE SIZE OF A PENCIL ERASER" WHERE THE RETENTION RING "DIGS INTO" THE PATIENT'S SKIN. THE SKIN BREAKDOWN REQUIRED TREATMENT AT AN ADVANCED WOUND CARE CLINIC WITH COLLAGEN THERAPY FOR 6-WEEKS. CURRENTLY, THE LEAKAGE "IS LESS BUT STILL THERE." THE SKIN BREAKDOWN HAS "IMPROVED" BUT THE SKIN REMAINS "PINK AND TENDER". THE PATIENT IS CURRENTLY USING DESITIN AND 4X4 GAUZE UNDER THE RETENTION RING TO HELP WITH GASTRIC LEAKAGE AND TUBE DISCOMFORT.

    Patient problems: Skin Erosion

    MAUDE report 9670401 ↗

Other TUBES, GASTROINTESTINAL (AND ACCESSORIES) devices

All TUBES, GASTROINTESTINAL (AND ACCESSORIES) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page