Skip to content

Accu-Chek Fastclix 05360145001Recalls & reported problems

Roche Diabetes Care GmbH · Accu-Chek Fastclix 102 Lancets Rtl 12/cs · Class 2

All models of Accu-Chek Fastclix (4)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00365702288102), received between Mar 5, 2020 and Feb 16, 2026 — classified as 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Retraction Problem” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Retraction Problem3
  • Delivered as Unsterile Product2
  • Material Fragmentation2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
  • Needle Stick/Puncture1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 16, 2026Retraction Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE LANCET PROTRUDES BEYOND THE END CAP OF THE DEVICE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24345297 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 23, 2025Retraction Problem; Retraction Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE NEEDLES ARE EXPOSED/VISIBLE. THE LANCETS WERE EXPOSED FROM THE DRUM OUT OF THE BOX AS THE NEEDLES WERE VISIBLE. THE SEAL OF THE BOX WAS BROKEN AS WELL. THE CUSTOMER SAID THAT THE DEFECT WAS APPARENT WHEN HE RECEIVED THE PRODUCT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23366748 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 7, 2023Delivered as Unsterile Product; Delivered as Unsterile Product

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE LANCET WAS EXPOSED, OUTSIDE OF THE LANCET DRUM, OUT OF BOX.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16310237 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 29, 2021Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A FRAGMENT OF THE LANCET BROKE OFF IN THE CUSTOMER'S FINGER. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THIS HAPPENED AROUND 3:00PM ON (B)(6) 2021, AND THE FOLLOWING DAY HE NOTICED A BUMP AND SWELLING OF THE FINGER. THE CUSTOMER WAS ABLE TO SELF-TREAT AND REMOVED THE LANCET FRAGMENT FROM HIS FINGER. NO MEDICAL TREATMENT WAS REQUIRED.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 11585459 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 2, 2020Delivered as Unsterile Product; Delivered as Unsterile Product

    THE CALLER REPORTED THAT HE OPENED A NEW BOX OF ACCU-CHEK FASTCLIX LANCET DRUMS; UPON REMOVING THE LANCETS FROM THE BOX, ONE OF THE LANCET DRUMS BROKE INTO PIECES AND THE LANCET CAME OUT. THE CUSTOMER RECEIVED AN ACCIDENTAL LANCET STICK ON THE PALM OF THE HAND. NO MEDICAL TREATMENT WAS REQUIRED.

    Patient problems: Needle Stick/Puncture

    MAUDE report 10931379 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 23, 2020Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE LANCET BROKE OFF IN THE PATIENT'S FINGER. THE PATIENT WAS ABLE TO REMOVE THE LANCET FRAGMENT BY HIMSELF AND DID NOT REQUIRE TREATMENT BY A MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL. HE RECEIVED AN X-RAY WHICH SHOWED PIECES OF THE LANCET REMAINED IN HIS FINGER.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9864944 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 5, 2020Retraction Problem; Retraction Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE LANCETS WERE UNCAPPED OUT OF BOX.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9792215 ↗

Other Multiple Use Blood Lancet For Single Patient Use Only devices

All Multiple Use Blood Lancet For Single Patient Use Only devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page