ACRYSOF® SN60AT (REF SN60AT.210)Recalls & reported problems
Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof(R) Natural SINGLE-PIECE ACRYLICFOLDABLE IOL, UV WITH BLUE LIGHT FILTER,POSTERIOR CHAMBER LENS (IOL/PC), 13.0mm LENGTH,6.0mm BICONVEX OPTIC, PLANAR HAPTICS. · Class 3 · Implant
All models of ACRYSOF (353)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380650130327), received between Aug 25, 2021 and Mar 14, 2023 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Calcified” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Calcified1
- Defective Device1
- Fracture1
Patient problems
- Insufficient Information2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 14, 2023Defective Device; Defective Device
A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT THE IOL WAS DEFECTIVE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED; HOWEVER, FURTHER INFORMATION HAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 16542645 ↗MalfunctionMar 22, 2022Fracture; Fracture
A NON HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANT PROCEDURE, SURGEON NOTICED A FRACTURE IN THE LENS. THE LENS WAS THEN CUT OUT AND REPLACED WITH BACKUP LENS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 13853495 ↗MalfunctionAug 25, 2021Calcified; Calcified
A SURGEON REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL)IMPLANTATION, ¿DEPOSITS/INCORPORATION¿ WERE PRESENT ON THE BACK SURFACE OF THE IOL. INITIALLY, THE SURGEON BELIEVED IT WAS AN AFTER CATARACT BUT THE DEPOSITS COULD NOT BE REMOVED WITH THE YAG LASER AND THE VISUAL ACUITY DID NOT IMPROVE. THE SURGEON BELIEVED THAT THE DEPOSITS WERE MOST LIKELY CALCIFICATIONS. IOL EXCHANGE OR REPLACEMENT IS NOT AN OPTION DUE TO THE CONDITION OF THE PATIENT¿S FELLOW EYE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED STATING THE PATIENT HAD A NORMAL HAAG STREIT (TEST) AND NO PHOTO SLIT LAMP. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12367551 ↗
Other intraocular lens devices
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens146 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens145 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens144 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens139 reports
- TECNIS SIMPLICITY DIB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens1 recall81 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens129 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens127 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens126 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page