Skip to content

ACRYSOF® Monoflex® MA60MA (REF MA60MA.000)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof(R) SOFT ACRYLIC MULTIPIECE STERILEPCL(IOL/PC), 13.0mm LENGTH, 6.0mm MENISCUSOPTIC, 5-DEGREE Monoflex(TM*) HAPTICS. *REG. U.S. PAT. & TM OFF. · Class 3 · Implant

All models of ACRYSOF Monoflex (94)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652240123), received between Mar 21, 2023 and Nov 27, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Defective Component1
  • Defective Device1
  • Failure to Advance1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1
  • Packaging Problem1
  • Scratched Material1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information3
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Eye Injury1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 27, 2025Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, DAMAGED TRAILING HAPTIC WAS NOTED. INCISION ENLARGEMENT WAS DONE, AND THE IOL WAS EXPLANTED DURING INITIAL PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Eye Injury

    MAUDE report 23666205 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 11, 2025Break; Break

    A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, IOL HAPTIC WAS FOUND BROKEN AFTER IMPLANTATION AND DECIDED TO EXPLANT THE LENS FROM THE PATIENT EYE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 23025970 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 3, 2025Break; Break

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE POSTERIOR HAPTIC WAS BROKEN. THE LENS WAS NOT IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT, THE PATIENT WAS FINE AND OTHER LENS WAS PLACED TO REPLACE THE FAULTY LENS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21291442 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 10, 2023Defective Component; Packaging Problem; Defective Component; Packaging Problem

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND STATED THAT, THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT THE DEVICE. THE PATIENT WAS LEFT APHAKIC.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 17903746 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 17, 2023Defective Device; Scratched Material; Defective Device; Scratched Material

    A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT A LENS WAS FOUND TO BE DAMAGED ON ITS SURFACE AND NOT HAVE A TYPICAL STRIPE WHEN GRASPED BY THE CLAMP OR PLUNGER. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 16753113 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 21, 2023Break; Failure to Advance; Break; Failure to Advance

    A OTHER HEALTH PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE LENS WAS STUCK TO THE EYE. THE SURGEON SAID THAT, THE LENS BROKE A HAPTICS WHEN IMPLANTED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER LENS DURING INITIAL PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO COMPLICATIONS TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16580577 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page