ACRYSOF® ACRYSERT® SN6CWS (REF SN6CWS.270)Recalls & reported problems
Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof(R) IQ ASPHERIC IOL, SP ACRYLIC FOLDABLELENS, w/AcrySert(R) DELIVERY SYSTEM, UV w/BLUELIGHT FILTER, 13.0mm LENGTH, 6.0mm ANTERIORASYMMETRIC BICONVEX OPTIC, PLANAR HAPTICS. · Class 3 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00380652249355), received between Jul 15, 2022 and Jul 15, 2022 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Damaged by Another Device” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Damaged by Another Device1
- Failure to Eject1
- Material Split, Cut or Torn1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 15, 2022Device Damaged by Another Device; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Failure to Eject; Device Damaged by Another Device; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Failure to Eject
A GOVERNMENT AGENCY REPORTED THAT DURING A CATARACT EXTRACTION WITH INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE ONE HAPTIC OF IOL WAS NOT FOLDED AS USUAL, THE IOL WAS ROTATED AS A WHOLE DURING INJECTING AND THE IOL WAS STUCK IN THE TIP OF THE INJECTOR. WHEN THE IOL WAS PUSHED IN TO THE PATIENT¿S ANTERIOR CHAMBER, THE STUCK HAPTIC WAS BROKEN AND DISSOCIATION, THE OTHER HAPTIC WAS SLIGHTLY TORN WITH THE OPTIC, AND THE DISSOCIATION HAPTIC WAS REMOVED AND THE EYE WAS BANDAGED AFTER APPLYING THE MIOTIC MEDICINE. ON THE SECOND DAY AFTER THE OPERATION, THE LENS WAS IN PLACE AND THE SLIGHTLY TORN PART WAS NOT IN OPTIC AND THE PUPIL WAS MIOSIS. THE PATIENT HAD NO HEADACHE, DIZZINESS, EYE PAIN, NAUSEA AND VOMITING SYMPTOMS. THE PATIENT HAD NO DISCOMFORT IN THE FOLLOW-UP VISIT ONE WEEK LATER. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15028192 ↗
Other intraocular lens devices
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens146 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens145 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens144 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens139 reports
- TECNIS SIMPLICITY DIB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens1 recall81 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens129 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens127 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens126 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page