Skip to content

ACRYSOF® SN6AT3 (REF SN6AT3.085)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof(R) IQ TORIC ASTIGMATISM IOL, SINGLE-PIECE ACRYLIC FOLDABLE LENS, UV WITH BLUE LIGHTFILTER, 13.0mm LENGTH, 6.0mm BICONVEX TORICASPHERIC OPTIC, 1.50 D CYLINDER. · Class 3 · Implant

All models of ACRYSOF (353)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652249669), received between Apr 30, 2021 and May 29, 2023 — classified as 1 injury, 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Crack” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Crack3
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Defective Device1
  • Scratched Material1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information4
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 29, 2023Crack; Crack

    A SURGEON REPORTED DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, NOTICED DIAGONAL CRACK/DAMAGE IN CENTRAL OPTIC.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 17016793 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 29, 2023Crack; Crack

    A SURGEON REPORTED DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, NOTICED SMALL MORE PERIPHERAL DIAGONAL CRACK IN OPTIC , LENS ALREADY IMPLANTED AND THEN EXPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 17016766 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 26, 2023Crack; Crack

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED DURING INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT, THERE WAS A DIAGONAL CRACK IN EXACT SAME SPOT ON LENS. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 17008962 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 11, 2022Scratched Material; Scratched Material

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT, DURING INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, DOCTOR NOTICED A SCRATCH RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE OPTIC AFTER IMPLANTING THE LENS. THIS RESULTED IN EXPLANTING THE LENS AND REPLACE IT WITH ANOTHER ONE DURING INITIAL PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15578396 ↗
  • InjuryJun 8, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION AFTER TWO MONTHS THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED DUE TO UNDESIRED REFRACTION OUTCOME. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED.

    Patient problems: Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 11956683 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 30, 2021Defective Device; Defective Device

    AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) REPLY CARD WAS RECEIVED FROM A CUSTOMER STATING THAT DURING AN IOL IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE LENS WAS ILL-FORMED AND REMOVED DURING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. THERE WAS PATIENT CONTACT BUT NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 11752196 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page