Skip to content

ACRYSOF® SN6AT3 (REF SN6AT3.215)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof(R) IQ TORIC ASTIGMATISM IOL, SINGLE-PIECE ACRYLIC FOLDABLE LENS, UV WITH BLUE LIGHTFILTER, 13.0mm LENGTH, 6.0mm BICONVEX TORICASPHERIC OPTIC, 1.50 D CYLINDER. · Class 3 · Implant

All models of ACRYSOF (353)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
11
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652249928), received between Mar 12, 2021 and Aug 1, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 9 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Defective Device” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Defective Device4
  • Break3
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
  • Scratched Material2
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information5
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
  • Blurred Vision1

Recent adverse event reports

The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 1, 2025Break; Break

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING IMPLANTATION OF INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) THE TRAILING HAPTIC WAS FOUND TO BE BROKEN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED HOWEVER NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 22688632 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 26, 2025Break; Break

    A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED WITH A DESCRIPTION OF WHEN THE LENS USED, THE HAPTIC FRACTURED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED AND RECEIVED STATING DURING PHACOERYSIS AND INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE IN RIGHT EYE, WHEN THE LENS USED, THE HAPTIC FRACTURED. THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS DURING INITIAL PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ON SAME DAY WITHOUT ANY IMPACT TO THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT WAS RECOVERED WITH SEQUELAE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED AND RECEIVED STATING LENS WAS REPLACED BY ANOTHER WITH THE SAME CHARACTERISTICS WITHOUT PROBLEMS, SO IT WAS RESOLVED IN THE SAME SURGERY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21466033 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 15, 2024Scratched Material; Scratched Material

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED WITH THE DESCRIPTION OF SCRATCHED INTRAOCULAR LENS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 18912699 ↗
  • InjuryDec 6, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT VISION WAS NOT CLEAR AND WORSENING. CLINICAL REASON WAS SUBLUXATED IOL. AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO REPOSITION BUT THE LENS WOULD NOT STAY IN PLACE. THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED FOR ANOTHER LENS MODEL 14 DAYS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL IMPLANT PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision

    MAUDE report 18272930 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 18, 2023Defective Device; Defective Device

    A NURSE REPORTED ABOUT A LENS DAMAGE DETECTED DURING INTRAOCULAR IMPLANTATION PROCEDURE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITH AN ANOTHER LENS. NO FURTHER INFORMATION EXPECTED AS REPORTER UNWILLING TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 17342532 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 30, 2022Defective Device; Defective Device

    A NON HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED WITH A DESCRIPTION OF FAULTY INJECTOR AND EXPLANTED THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15518730 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 28, 2022Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    A CONSUMER REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING A CATARACT EXTRACTION WITH INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, A LINE GOING THROUGH THE IMPLANTED IOL. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED STATING THE PATIENT WAS OUT OF TOWN AND FELL OFF HER BIKE AND HIT HER HEAD. THE PATIENT STATES THAT SHE FRACTURED HER CHEEK, BROKE ONE ARM, AND SPRAINED THE OTHER. THE CHEEK FRACTURE WAS ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF HER IOL. SHE SAW A PHYSICIAN WHO SAW THERE WAS A CRACK IN HER LENS. SHE LATER FOLLOWED UP WITH HER REGULAR PHYSICIAN, WHO STATED THAT THE LINE WAS PROBABLY THERE THE WHOLE TIME. SHE DOES NOT KNOW IF IT WAS EVER NOTED IN HER RECORDS PRIOR TO THE ACCIDENT. SHE ALSO DOES NOT KNOW IF SHE EVEN SAW THE LINE IN HER VISION PRIOR TO HER ACCIDENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15119292 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 26, 2022Defective Device; Defective Device

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT LENS IS BEING RETURNED DUE TO DEFECT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 14208326 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 25, 2022Defective Device; Defective Device

    A NON-HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED DURING THE INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTATION THE LENS WAS DAMAGED HENCE IT WAS REMOVED IN THE SAME PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13601663 ↗
  • InjuryAug 19, 2021Break; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Break; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE LENS WAS INJECTED. THE HAPTIC WAS REMAINED IN THE CARTRIDGE AND THE IMPLANTED IOL WAS LEFT WITH ONLY ONE HAPTIC. THE LENS WAS OFF CENTER IN THE EYE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12344583 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 12, 2021Scratched Material; Scratched Material

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING A CATARACT SURGERY WITH AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION PROCEDURE, A SCRATCH WAS OBSERVED ON THE IMPLANTED IOL. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE SCRATCHES WERE ON THE CENTRAL AREA. THE PATIENT KNOWS THAT THE LENS IS SCRATCHED, WHICH IS WHY SHE WANTS TO CHANGE IT, EVEN WITH 20/20 VISION. THE PATIENT'S SYMPTOMS ARE DESCRIBED AS "SEES SOMETHING ON THE SIDES". THE PATIENT IS GETTING BETTER BUT DOES NOT WANT A SCRATCHED LENS. AN IOL EXCHANGE HAS BEEN PLANNED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11478128 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page