Skip to content

ACRYSOF® SN6AT3 (REF SN6AT3.225)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof(R) IQ TORIC ASTIGMATISM IOL, SINGLE-PIECE ACRYLIC FOLDABLE LENS, UV WITH BLUE LIGHTFILTER, 13.0mm LENGTH, 6.0mm BICONVEX TORICASPHERIC OPTIC, 1.50 D CYLINDER. · Class 3 · Implant

All models of ACRYSOF (353)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652249942), received between Oct 26, 2021 and May 19, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Scratched Material” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Scratched Material2
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Break1
  • Failure to Eject1
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information3
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available2
  • Adhesion(s)1
  • Blurred Vision1
  • Corneal Clouding/Hazing1
  • Visual Disturbances1

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 19, 2026Material Split, Cut or Torn

    A PHARMACIST REPORTED THAT LENS HAD BEEN BROKEN AS THE LENS DID NOT COME LOOSE FROM INJECTOR. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED. THERE ARE TWO MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS FILE. THIS REPORT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE 1 OF 2 FILES.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 25216979 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 21, 2025Scratched Material; Scratched Material

    A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED WITH A DESCRIPTION OF MARK ON LENS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 23619445 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 27, 2025Break; Break

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING SURGERY THE PATIENT UNDERWENT PHACOEMULSIFICATION OF CATARACT AND IOL (INTRAOCULAR LENS) IMPLANTATION IN THE RIGHT EYE UNDER LOCAL ANESTHESIA. AFTER OPENING THE PACKAGING OF THE IOL AND PREPARING FOR ITS IMPLANTATION, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT ONE OF THE HAPTICS OF THE IOL WAS BROKEN, RENDERING IT UNIMPLANTABLE. SO, THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY BY USING ANOTHER MODEL LENS WITH SAME POWER. THE PATIENT RECOVERED WELL AFTER THE SURGERY AND HAD NO DISCOMFORT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22085945 ↗
  • InjuryNov 8, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT AFTER SURGERY, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED BLURRY VISION WHEN READING. CLINICAL REASON BEING MENTIONED AS IOL (INTRAOCULAR LENS) MALFUNCTION. THE IOL WAS EXPLANTED AND EXCHANGED FOR AN UNKNOWN MONOFOCAL LENS FOLLOWING THE SECONDARY IMPLANT PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision

    MAUDE report 20641470 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 9, 2024Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

    A NON-HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, REPORTED WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THAT LENS WAS BEING INSERTED, WHEN NOTICED A BEND IN LENS UNDER MICROSCOPE, SO TOOK LENS OUT DURING INITIAL PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED, BUT NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 18674722 ↗
  • InjuryNov 1, 2023Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE SURGEON AND STATED THAT, THE PATIENT HAD VITRECTOMY (AS PER THE PATIENT). THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Adhesion(s); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Corneal Clouding/Hazing; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 18045927 ↗
  • InjuryApr 18, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A DIRECTOR OF NURSING REPORTED THAT AFTER INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION, PATIENT COMPLAINED OF INTOLERABLE LENS IMPLANT. THE IOL WAS EXPLANTED IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED, BUT NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 16762612 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 14, 2022Scratched Material; Scratched Material

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT DURING INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE LENS WAS NOTED SCRATCHED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13521247 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 26, 2021Failure to Eject; Failure to Eject

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE LENS WAS UNABLE TO INSERT. THERE WAS PATIENT CONTACT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12697924 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page