Skip to content

ACRYSOF® SN6AT4 (REF SN6AT4.165)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof(R) IQ TORIC ASTIGMATISM IOL, SINGLE-PIECE ACRYLIC FOLDABLE LENS, UV WITH BLUE LIGHTFILTER, 13.0mm LENGTH, 6.0mm BICONVEX TORICASPHERIC OPTIC, 2.25 D CYLINDER. · Class 3 · Implant

All models of ACRYSOF (353)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652250351), received between Sep 26, 2022 and Nov 28, 2023 — classified as 3 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Defective Device” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Defective Device1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1

Patient problems

  • Blurred Vision2
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Visual Disturbances1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 28, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT HAD BLURRED VISION. THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED FOR ANOTHER MODEL COMPANY LENS. CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT MENTIONED AS LENS ROTATION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision

    MAUDE report 18214112 ↗
  • InjuryMar 3, 2023Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    A NON HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED FOLLOWING THE INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTATION THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE DUE TO SEEING REFLECTIONS AND SUBSURFACE GLISTENINGS AND NANO GLISTENINGS. THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT NOR THE PATIENT WAS HOSPITALIZED FOR THE EVENT. THE PROGNOSIS WAS GOOD AND THE PATIENT ISSUES HAVE RESOLVED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 16476176 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 17, 2023Defective Device; Defective Device

    A PHARMACIST REPORTED AS IOL WAS DEFECTIVE NOTED DURING THE POSE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED, BUT NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 16394301 ↗
  • InjurySep 26, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED BLURRY VISION. PATIENT FELT VISION WAS WORSE THAN BEFORE SURGERY. DOCTOR FOUND PATIENT TO HAVE RESIDUAL REFRACTIVE ERROR WITH POSTERIOR CAPSULAR HAZE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT IRIS REPAIR WAS PERFORMED AND THE LENS WAS EXPLAINED. THE LENS WAS REPLACED WITH NON-COMPANY PRODUCT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM AND PATIENT WAS NOT HOSPITALIZED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED, BUT FURTHER NO INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Blurred Vision; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 15485868 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page