Skip to content

ACRYSOF® SN6AT4 (REF SN6AT4.210)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof(R) IQ TORIC ASTIGMATISM IOL, SINGLE-PIECE ACRYLIC FOLDABLE LENS, UV WITH BLUE LIGHTFILTER, 13.0mm LENGTH, 6.0mm BICONVEX TORICASPHERIC OPTIC, 2.25 D CYLINDER. · Class 3 · Implant

All models of ACRYSOF (353)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
11
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652250443), received between Dec 2, 2021 and Dec 19, 2025 — classified as 5 injuries, 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material2
  • Failure to Advance2
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Break1
  • Defective Device1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Failure to Align1

Patient problems

  • Visual Impairment6
  • Blurred Vision4
  • Insufficient Information4
  • Dry Eye(s)1
  • Visual Disturbances1

Recent adverse event reports

The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 19, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT AFTER THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION SURGERY, THE IOL ROTATED POST SURGERY CAUSING REFRACTIVE SURPRISE.

    Patient problems: Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 23850410 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 30, 2025Product Quality Problem; Product Quality Problem

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED WITH A DESCRIPTION OF DEFECTIVE INTRAOCULAR LENS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21273645 ↗
  • InjuryApr 4, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EASON AS NOT ABLE TO SEE AS EXPECTED AND CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT BEING PATIENT COULDN'T SEE WELL WITH LENS DESIGN, BETTER SUITED FOR UPGRADED LENS. THE IOL WAS EXPLANTED AND EXCHANGED FOR AN UNKNOWN ATIOL FOLLOWING THE INITIAL IMPLANT PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 19039813 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 20, 2023Break; Failure to Advance; Break; Failure to Advance

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE IOL WAS NOT DELIVERED COMPLETELY INTO THE ANTERIOR CHAMBER DUE TO RESISTANCE IN THE CARTRIDGE. IOL WAS GENTLY PULLED OUT FROM CARTRIDGE BUT TRAILING HAPTIC BROKE OFF. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 18363368 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 10, 2023Failure to Advance; Defective Device; Failure to Advance; Defective Device

    A NURSE REPORTED DURING THE INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTATION THE LENS WAS RIGID AND STIFF AND DID NOT SLIDE FORWARD IN THE CARTRIDGE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED AND RECEIVED STATING THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITH NO ISSUES.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 16519853 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 24, 2023Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED DECREASED VISION. THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. THE CLINICAL REASON FOR THE EXPLANT WAS LENS GLISTENING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED, BUT FURTHER NO INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 16436178 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 8, 2022Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THERE WERE LEFT OVER FRAGMENTS IN THE EYE THAT HAD TO BE REMOVED DURING THE CASE AND PATIENT EXPERIENCED BLURRY VISION AT ALL DISTANCES. PATIENT ALSO STATED HE HAS DRY AMD (AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION) THAT IS SLOW PROGRESSIVELY AND IS NOT IMPACTING HIS VISION ACCORDING TO HIS DOCTORS. HE IS ALSO EXPERIENCING ASTIGMATISM. THERE ARE TWO MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RIGHT EYE.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 15751105 ↗
  • InjuryAug 22, 2022Inaccurate Delivery; Inaccurate Delivery

    A NURSE REPORTED FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED BLURRED VISION. THE LENS WAS EXCHANGED IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE AND THE CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT WAS FLIPPED AXIS WITH TORIC LENS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED WHICH STATES THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision

    MAUDE report 15269217 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 19, 2022Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON FOUND THAT IOL HAD LENS MATERIAL HANGING OFF THE EDGE OF THE IOL. THE MATERIAL WAS REMOVED BY SURGEON WITH FORCEPS. THE REMOVED PIECES WERE NOT SAVED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15051748 ↗
  • InjuryMar 25, 2022Failure to Align; Failure to Align

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING IMPLANTATION OF AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED REFRACTIVE SURPRISE, FAINT SHADOW. SLIGHT FLUCTUATION UNCORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY ON POST OP VISITS DUE TO DRY EYE. PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH PLUGS AND MEDICATIONS, NO CHANGE IN SYMPTOMS. ONLINE CALCULATOR SHOWS ROTATION OF 14 DEGREES CCW TO 175. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Dry Eye(s); Visual Disturbances; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 13903981 ↗
  • InjuryDec 2, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED AND REPORTED THAT THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED FOR THE SAME LENS MODEL BUT ONE DIOPTER LESS POWER INDICATING THE CORRECT LENS POWER WAS NOT IMPLANTED INITIALLY. THERE IS NO REPORTED DEFECT OR FAULT WITH THE IOL.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 12917918 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page