Skip to content

ACRYSOF® SN6AT5 (REF SN6AT5.250)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof(R) IQ TORIC ASTIGMATISM IOL, SINGLE-PIECE ACRYLIC FOLDABLE LENS, UV WITH BLUE LIGHTFILTER, 13.0mm LENGTH, 6.0mm BICONVEX TORICASPHERIC OPTIC, 3.00 D CYLINDER. · Class 3 · Implant

All models of ACRYSOF (353)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652251099), received between Dec 14, 2021 and Aug 8, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare1
  • Difficult to Advance1
  • Material Deformation1
  • Optical Decentration1
  • Scratched Material1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information3
  • Visual Disturbances2
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 8, 2025Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Scratched Material; Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Scratched Material

    A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT BEFORE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION PROCEDURE AND DURING LOADING THE LENS WAS SCRATCHED AND DENTED. THERE WAS SIGNIFICANT RESISTANCE DURING INJECTION, AND THE SURGEON OBSERVED THAT THE METALLIC ARM OF THE INJECTOR HAD BEEN RESTING ON TOP OF THE LENS INSIDE THE CARTRIDGE. THE SURGEON EXAMINED THE LENS UNDER THE MICROSCOPE AFTER PUSHING THE IOL THROUGH THE CARTRIDGE AND DECIDED TO REUSE IT, EVEN THOUGH THE MARK WAS OFF AXIS. NO FURTHER INFORMATION EXPECTED AS REPORTER UNWILLING TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 22751338 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 24, 2022Difficult to Advance; Difficult to Advance

    A NON HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING IMPLANTATION OF AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) THE LENS WOULD NOT DEPLOY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 14487329 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 17, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A OPHTHALMIC SURGEON REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING IMPLANTATION OF AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED DOUBLE VISION AND ANISEIKONIA. THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 13547673 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 25, 2022Optical Decentration; Optical Decentration

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED DUE TO MECHANICAL MALFUNCTION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED DIPLOPIA AND EXAMINATION SHOWED THE DISPLACED LENS. THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE FOR DIFFERENT POWER LENS. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 13341712 ↗
  • InjuryDec 14, 2021Material Deformation; Material Deformation

    A PHARMACIST REPORTED DURING A CATARACT EXTRACTION WITH INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THERE WAS LOSS OF SUPPORT WITH DISRUPTION OF THE HAPTIC. IT HAD TO BE REPLACED FOR IMPLANT WITH SCLERAL FIXATION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 13004327 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page