ACRYSOF® SN6AT6 (REF SN6AT6.170)Recalls & reported problems
Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof(R) IQ TORIC ASTIGMATISM IOL, SINGLE-PIECE ACRYLIC FOLDABLE LENS, UV WITH BLUE LIGHTFILTER, 13.0mm LENGTH, 6.0mm BICONVEX TORICASPHERIC OPTIC, 3.75 D CYLINDER. · Class 3 · Implant
All models of ACRYSOF (353)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652274272), received between Aug 30, 2022 and Mar 3, 2023 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Eject” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Failure to Eject1
Patient problems
- Blurred Vision2
- Insufficient Information1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 3, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AN OPERATION ROOM DIRECTOR REPORTED FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT WAS NOT HAPPY WITH NEAR VISION, WOULD PREFER DISTANCE. THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. THE CLINICAL REASON FOR THE EXPLANT WAS REFRACTIVE TARGET WAS NEAR BUT PREFER DISTANCE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED, BUT FURTHER NO INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Blurred Vision
MAUDE report 16476175 ↗InjuryDec 12, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED BLURRY VISION. THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. THE CLINICAL REASON FOR THE EXPLANT WAS MECHANICAL COMPLICATIONS RIGHT EYE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Blurred Vision
MAUDE report 15959274 ↗MalfunctionAug 30, 2022Failure to Eject; Failure to Eject
A NON HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT THE LENS WOULDN'T EJECT PROPERLY WITH PATIENT CONTACT THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 15318346 ↗
Other intraocular lens devices
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens146 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens145 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens144 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens139 reports
- TECNIS SIMPLICITY DIB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens1 recall81 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens129 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens127 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens126 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page