Skip to content

ACRYSOF® SN6AT7 (REF SN6AT7.180)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof(R) IQ TORIC ASTIGMATISM IOL, SINGLE-PIECE ACRYLIC FOLDABLE LENS, UV WITH BLUE LIGHTFILTER, 13.0mm LENGTH, 6.0mm BICONVEX TORICASPHERIC OPTIC, 4.50 D CYLINDER. · Class 3 · Implant

All models of ACRYSOF (353)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00380652275880), received between Mar 3, 2023 and Mar 3, 2023 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Failure to Advance1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 3, 2023Break; Failure to Advance; Break; Failure to Advance

    A NURSE MANAGER REPORTED THAT DURING A CATARACT EXTRACTION WITH AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE LENS WAS MOUNTED ON THE CARTRIDGE IN THE COMPANY INJECTOR. AT THE TIME OF INSERTION, IT WAS NOTICED THAT IT WAS A LITTLE HARDER THAN NORMAL. DOCTOR SAW THIS AND REMOVED THE CARTRIDGE FROM THE EYE, THE LENS WAS SEEN AT THE TIP OF THE CARTRIDGE WHICH WHEN OBSERVED IT UNDER A MICROSCOPE HE COULD SEE THAT THE CARTRIDGE WAS ALL OPEN AND WHEN REMOVED THE LENS IT WAS APPRECIATED THAT THE LOWER HAPTIC WAS BROKEN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED STATING PROCEDURE WAS NOT COMPLETED DURING THE SURGERY AND THE PATIENT WAS SCHEDULED FOR LENS IMPLANTATION IN A SECOND SURGERY. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM AND PATIENT WAS NOT HOSPITALIZED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED STATING PATIENT'S LENS IMPLANTATION WAS PERFORMED IN A SECOND SURGERY. PATIENT WAS FINE AND WITH A VERY SATISFACTORY RECOVERY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16476390 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page