Skip to content

ACRYSOF® SA60WF (REF SA60WF.170)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof(R) ASPHERIC IOL, SINGLE-PIECE ACRYLICFOLDABLE POSTERIOR CHAMBER LENS,UV-ABSORBING, 13.0mm LENGTH, 6.0mm ANTERIORASYMMETRIC BICONVEX OPTIC, PLANAR HAPTICS. · Class 3 · Implant

All models of ACRYSOF (353)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652332606), received between Apr 13, 2021 and Apr 18, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Crack” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Crack1
  • Scratched Material1

Patient problems

  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Capsular Bag Tear1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Visual Disturbances1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 18, 2024Scratched Material; Scratched Material

    A OTHER HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT WHEN INSPECTED A LENS FOUND A SMALL SCRATCH ON THE OPTICS OUTSIDE THE VISUAL AXIS. THE LENS WAS REMAINS IMPLANTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19132954 ↗
  • InjuryJan 17, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING IMPLANTATION OF AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) THE CAPSULE WAS OPENED WHEN LENS WAS PLACED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED, BUT NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Capsular Bag Tear

    MAUDE report 13264541 ↗
  • InjurySep 8, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A CONSUMER REPORTED SEEING A BAR AND YELLOW DOTS FOLLOWING IMPLANTATION OF AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL). SHE REQUESTED AN IOL FOR ALLERGY TESTING AND NOTED THAT THE CORNEA DID NOT ACCEPT THE LENS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED AND RECEIVED. THE CONSUMER REPORTED BLURRED VISION. THE OPHTHALMOLOGIST RECORDED PERSISTENT DYSPHOTOPSIA, CORNEA GUTTATA, SEVERE PHOTOPHOBIA WITH VISUAL ACUITY OF 61.3%. NO COMPLICATIONS DURING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED. ALLERGY TESTING INFORMATION PROVIDED. TYPE OF ALLERGY TESTING: EPICUTANEOUS TEST, RESULT NEGATIVE.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Visual Disturbances; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 12437363 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 13, 2021Crack; Crack

    A CUSTOMER REPORTED AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) CRACKED IN THE MIDDLE POSSIBLY DUE TO THE CARTRIDGE. THE LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITHOUT INCIDENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS REQUESTED. THERE ARE TWO RELATED REPORTS FOR THIS EVENT. THIS REPORT ADDRESSES THE IOL, AND ANOTHER MANUFACTURER REPORT WILL BE FILED FOR THE CARTRIDGE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11660250 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page