Skip to content

ACRYSOF® SA60WF (REF SA60WF.195)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof(R) ASPHERIC IOL, SINGLE-PIECE ACRYLICFOLDABLE POSTERIOR CHAMBER LENS,UV-ABSORBING, 13.0mm LENGTH, 6.0mm ANTERIORASYMMETRIC BICONVEX OPTIC, PLANAR HAPTICS. · Class 3 · Implant

All models of ACRYSOF (353)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
15
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 15 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652332651), received between Mar 26, 2021 and May 6, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 14 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Defective Device” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Defective Device3
  • Scratched Material3
  • Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Break1
  • Defective Component1
  • Device Damaged by Another Device1
  • Failure to Eject1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information7
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
  • Blurred Vision1
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 15 most recent of 15 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 6, 2026Material Split, Cut or Torn

    A NURSE REPORTED THAT DURING THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, OBSERVED TEARS. THE LENS WAS CAREFULLY INSPECTED BEFORE LOADING AND NO TEARS WAS OBSERVED. AFTER THE LENS UNFOLDED IN THE PATIENT EYE A SIGNIFICANT TEAR WAS SEEN. THE TEARS MUST HAVE OCCURRED IN CONNECTION WITH THE LOADING OF THE LENSES. DURING LOADING, THE UTMOST CARE WAS TAKEN, THE OPTIC WAS NOT TOUCHED, AND ALL CONTACT WAS MADE ONLY WITH THE HAPTICS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED AND RECEIVED STATING THAT LENS WAS LEFT IN PATIENT EYE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 25093612 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 19, 2025Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

    A PHARMACIST REPORTED WITH A DESCRIPTION, HAPTIC OF THE LENS WAS DAMAGED. THE LENS WAS REPLACED BEFORE IMPLANTATION. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23095310 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 4, 2025Scratched Material; Scratched Material

    A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE THERE WAS A SCRATCH MARK IN THE OPTIC OF THE LENS. HENCE THE LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED STATING THAT, THE SURGEON BELIEVES THAT THE INJECTOR PLUNGER MIGHT HAVE CAUSED THE SCRATCH IN THE POSTERIOR SIDE OF THE LENS.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 22402890 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 9, 2025Break; Break

    A NON HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT, BEFORE INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTATION SURGERY, THE HAPTIC WAS BROKEN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21996427 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 11, 2024Defective Component; Defective Component

    A NON-HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, WHEN THE IOL WAS BEING LOADED THE HAPTIC GOT STUCK. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED. THERE ARE THREE MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REPORT. THIS IS 2 OF 3.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20653756 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 19, 2024Scratched Material; Scratched Material

    A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING SURGERY, THEY NOTICED THAT THE LENS WITH A SCRATCH ON THE OPTICS. HAD TO BE REMOVED USING A LENS CUTTER AND THEN IMPLANTED A NEW LENS DURING INITIAL PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19142864 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 8, 2023Defective Device; Defective Device

    A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT THE INTRAOCULAR LENS WAS DEFECTIVE.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 16886237 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 10, 2022Defective Device; Defective Device

    A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, A DEFORMED LENS WAS NOTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 14344091 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 28, 2022Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material

    A PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT REPORTED THAT DURING A CATARACT EXTRACTION WITH INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE STRING WAS FOUND ON THE LENS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED AND RECEIVED STATED THAT THE LENS WAS REMAINED IMPLANTED IN THE EYE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 14235560 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 11, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED SEVERE BLURRY VISION, RESIDUAL HYPEROPIA AND REFRACTIVE SURPRISE. THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED FOR ANOTHER LENS MODEL 8 DAYS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL IMPLANT PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 13512609 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 2, 2022Scratched Material; Scratched Material

    A SURGEON REPORTED THAT, FOLLOWING INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, A SCRATCH ON THE IOL WAS NOTED. AS THE SCRATCH WAS AWAY FROM THE CENTER OF THE LENS SO SURGEON FELT IT WOULD NOT BE AN ISSUE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION COULD NOT BE OBTAINED AS THE REPORTER IS UNWILLING TO FOLLOW-UP.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13433700 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 11, 2022Defective Device; Defective Device

    A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED VIA IOL REPLY CARD, STATING THAT THE LENS WAS DAMAGED WHILE BEING USED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13227151 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 1, 2021Failure to Eject; Failure to Eject

    A NURSE REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, AN IOL BECAME STUCK IN THE CARTRIDGE. THERE WAS PATIENT CONTACT WITH THE DEVICE AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED THE SAME DAY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12561736 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 12, 2021Device Damaged by Another Device; Device Damaged by Another Device

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11649167 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 26, 2021Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material

    A NURSE REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THERE WAS AN UNIDENTIFIED PLASTIC LIKE MATERIAL BEHIND THE LENS AFTER INSERTION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED THAT THE SURGEON NOTICED WHAT LOOKED LIKE CORTEX BEHIND THE LENS. THERE WERE NO ADDITIONAL ISSUES. AT SECOND DAY POST OP, THE PATIENT WAS DOING WELL. THERE ARE THREE MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS FACILITY. THIS REPORT IS ASSOCIATED WITH 1OF 3.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 11574641 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page