Skip to content

ACRYSOF® SA60WF (REF SA60WF.280)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof(R) ASPHERIC IOL, SINGLE-PIECE ACRYLICFOLDABLE POSTERIOR CHAMBER LENS,UV-ABSORBING, 13.0mm LENGTH, 6.0mm ANTERIORASYMMETRIC BICONVEX OPTIC, PLANAR HAPTICS. · Class 3 · Implant

All models of ACRYSOF (353)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652332828), received between Mar 29, 2021 and Jul 4, 2025 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Device Damaged Prior to Use1
  • Failure to Advance1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 4, 2025Break; Break

    A NURSE REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, HAPTIC WAS BROKEN BEFORE IMPLANTATION. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY USING ANOTHER LENS. THERE WAS NO IMPACT ON PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED. THERE ARE TWO MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REPORT. THIS IS 2 OF 2.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22402865 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 22, 2022Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance

    A NON HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON TRIED TO INSERT LENS, IT CAME OUT TOO EARLY. THE SURGEON MADE THE DECISION TO USE A NEW LENS. NO PATIENT HARM REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14186271 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 29, 2021Device Damaged Prior to Use; Device Damaged Prior to Use

    AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) REPLY CARD WAS RECEIVED WITH A REPORT OF LENS DAMAGED. NO PATIENT HARM WAS REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11582888 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page