Skip to content

AcrySof® IQ PanOptix® Trifocal IOL TFNT00 (REF TFNT00.170)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof® IQ PanOptix® Trifocal intraocular lenses is an ultraviolet absorbing and blue light filtering foldable multifocal IOL · Class 3 · Implant

All models of AcrySof IQ PanOptix Trifocal IOL (73)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652357678), received between Jul 15, 2021 and Oct 6, 2023 — classified as 4 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Defective Device” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
  • Defective Device1

Patient problems

  • Halo2
  • Visual Disturbances2
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Itching Sensation1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 6, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT, FOLLOWING THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, CONSUMER'S EYES HAVE BEEN ITCHING EVER SINCE. THE PATIENT IS VERY REACTIVE TO ALL PRODUCTS DERIVED FROM CORN AND NEEDS TO KNOW IF ANY CORN DERIVED MATERIALS ARE USED IN THE MANUFACTURING OF THESE LENSES. THE PATIENT DID NOT GET RELIEF FROM KETOTIFEN EYEDROPS. THERE ARE TWO MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE 2 OF 2. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Itching Sensation

    MAUDE report 17884069 ↗
  • InjuryMar 29, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NURSE REPORTED THAT, AFTER INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED HALOS AND GLARE EFFECT AND WAS UNABLE TO ADAPT TO THE DYSPHOTOPSIA. THE IOL WAS REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE WITH NO PATIENT HARM. THERE ARE TWO MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RIGHT EYE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED, BUT NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Halo; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 16634067 ↗
  • InjuryMar 29, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED STATED THAT THE PATIENT WAS FACING SEVERE GLARE AND HALOS 24/7 AND THEY WERE WORST AT NIGHT. THE LENS WAS REPLACED WITH A NON-COMPANY LENS. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM AFTER LENS EXCHANGE.

    Patient problems: Halo; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 16634003 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 20, 2022Defective Device; Defective Device

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE LENS HAD A DEFECT AND IT WAS EXPLANTED AND ANOTHER LENS WAS IMPLANTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 16012965 ↗
  • InjuryJul 15, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT, FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT WAS UNABLE TO ADAPT TO THE MULTIFOCAL IOL AND USING READERS FOR CLOSE UP ACTIVITIES. APPROXIMATELY WITHIN TWO MONTHS THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED FOR A MONOFOCAL IOL IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 12172679 ↗

Other Lens, multifocal intraocular devices

All Lens, multifocal intraocular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page