Skip to content

AcrySof® IQ PanOptix® Trifocal IOL TFNT00 (REF TFNT00.260)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof® IQ PanOptix® Trifocal intraocular lenses is an ultraviolet absorbing and blue light filtering foldable multifocal IOL · Class 3 · Implant

All models of AcrySof IQ PanOptix Trifocal IOL (73)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652357852), received between Nov 19, 2021 and Aug 10, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Defective Device” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 1 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Defective Device3
  • Failure to Deliver1
  • Material Deformation1
  • Scratched Material1

Patient problems

  • Visual Disturbances3
  • Visual Impairment3
  • Halo2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Blurred Vision1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Posterior Capsule Opacification1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 10, 2026Failure to Deliver

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 50192982 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 15, 2025Material Deformation; Material Deformation

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT CATARACT SURGERY TO LEFT EYE ON (B)(6) 2019. SUBSEQUENTLY, A YAG CAPSULOTOMY WAS PERFORMED IN THE LEFT EYE ON (B)(6) 2022. IN 2025 THE PATIENT WENT FOR THE FOLLOW UP AND UPON EXAMINATION, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE INTRAOCULAR LENS IN THE LEFT EYE WAS DIFFUSELY STUDDED WITH GLISTENING ACROSS THE ENTIRE OPTIC SURFACE. THIS WAS NOT LOCALIZED TO A FEW SPOTS BUT INVOLVED THE WHOLE LENS OPTIC. AS A RESULT, THE PATIENT VISION DROPPED BY ONE LINE FOR BOTH DISTANCE AND NEAR IN THE LEFT EYE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED. THERE ARE TWO MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PATIENT. THIS FILE IS FOR LEFT EYE (OS).

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Posterior Capsule Opacification

    MAUDE report 23278872 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 6, 2024Defective Device; Scratched Material; Defective Device; Scratched Material

    A PHARMACIST REPORTED VIA REGULATORY AUTHORITY STATING DURING INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON NOTICED AFTER IMPLANTING INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL), AN APPARENT IRREGULARITY IN THE OPTICS OF THE IOL IN THE CENTRAL AREA, A POSSIBLE MANUFACTURING DEFECT OR SUPERFICIAL ABRASION OF THE IOL. THE LENS WAS REMOVED DURING INITIAL PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ON SAME DAY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED STATING NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20154715 ↗
  • InjuryJun 10, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A FEMTO LASIK AND THE VISION WAS +1 SPH. THE PATIENT HAS COMA IN THE LEFT EYE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED. THERE TWO COMPLAINTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PATIENT. THIS IS 2 OF 2 FILES.

    Patient problems: Visual Disturbances; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 19499124 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 8, 2024Defective Device; Defective Device

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, IOL DAMAGED AT THE OPTIC HAPTIC JUNCTION. THE SURGEON WAS NOT SURE OF LENS HAVING DAMAGED BEFORE LOADING OR AFTER LOADING TO THE CARTRIDGE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED AND RECEIVED STATING THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITH THE SAME LENS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18462789 ↗
  • InjurySep 14, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A CONSUMER REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING A CATARACT EXTRACTION WITH INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, SHE EXPERIENCED HUGE STARBURSTS AND SHE CANNOT DRIVE AT NIGHT ANYMORE. SHE IS ALSO EXPERIENCING HALOS WHICH ARE TERRIBLE AT NIGHT AND UNDER BRIGHT LIGHTS DURING THE DAY, SHE IS ALSO EXPERIENCING BIT OF A SHADOWING AROUND LETTERS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED. THERE ARE TWO MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. THIS REPORT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE LEFT EYE.

    Patient problems: Halo; Visual Disturbances; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 15416678 ↗
  • InjurySep 14, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A CONSUMER REPORTED FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANT PROCEDURE, SHE WAS EXPERIENCING HUGE STARBURST AND HALOS, SHE CAN'T DRIVE AT NIGHT ANYMORE. CONSUMER DISCUSSED WITH HER SURGEON AND HER SURGEON ADVISED TO REPLACE THE IOL WITH ANOTHER BRAND. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED. THERE ARE TWO MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. THIS REPORT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RIGHT EYE.

    Patient problems: Halo; Visual Disturbances; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 15416284 ↗
  • InjuryNov 19, 2021Defective Device; Defective Device

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT, DURING CATARACT SURGERY WITH INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, HAPTICS GOT RUPTURED INSIDE THE CARTRIDGE. A REPLACEMENT OF THE LENS WAS MADE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED BY CONSUMER THAT, THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 12846904 ↗

Other Lens, multifocal intraocular devices

All Lens, multifocal intraocular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page