Skip to content

AcrySof® IQ PanOptix® Toric Trifocal IOL TFNT30 (REF TFNT30.200)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof® IQ PanOptix® Toric Trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) are ultraviolet absorbing and blue light filtering foldable multifocal IOLs · Class 3 · Implant

All models of AcrySof IQ PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL (165)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652389976), received between May 23, 2022 and Dec 29, 2025 — classified as 4 injuries, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Break1
  • Defective Device1
  • Device Damaged by Another Device1
  • Failure to Eject1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information3
  • Visual Disturbances3
  • Blurred Vision2
  • Halo2
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 29, 2025Break; Break

    A NON-HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION SURGERY THE LENS CAME OUT OF THE CARTRIDGE WITH ONE HAPTIC BROKEN. THE PHYSICIAN WAS UNABLE TO IMPLANT THE DAMAGED IOL WHICH HAD TO BE REMOVED INTO TWO PARTS. THE PATIENT WAS WAITING FOR ANOTHER LENS IMPLANTATION SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 23908256 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 5, 2024Device Damaged by Another Device; Failure to Eject; Device Damaged by Another Device; Failure to Eject

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED THAT VISION ON THE OPERATED EYE HAD 6/15 WITH HIGH ASTIGMATISM. DOCTOR PLANS TO REMOVE SUTURE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19679724 ↗
  • InjuryJun 7, 2023Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT VISION HAD REGRESSED, GLISTENING'S DEVELOPED, LENS WERE STUCK TO THE CAPSULE IN BOTH EYES DURING SURGERY AND VIRTUOUS STRANDS AROUND THE INTRAOCULAR LENS. THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH OTHER LENS IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 17076555 ↗
  • InjuryApr 6, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE VISION NOT AS EXPECTED. THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 16688523 ↗
  • InjuryNov 2, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING THE IMPLANTATION OF INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) PATIENT EXPERIENCED HALOS AND GLARES AT NIGHT THAT ARE SO BAD AND TRAFFIC SIGNAGE WAS BLURRY. THE PATIENT COULD NOT READ SIGNS UNTIL NEAR. THE OPTOMETRIST TOLD THAT THE LENS SHIFTED AFTER SURGERY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND PATIENT HAD RIM AND PULSES AT THE CORNER OF THE EYE WHEN LOOKED TO LEFT AND SIGNS ARE HARD TO MAKE OUT UNTIL RIGHT UNDER THEM. THE PATIENT DO NOT DRIVE AT NIGHT AS SHE SEES GLARES AND HALOS AND BLURRY SIGNS AT NIGHT, BUT TO A LESSER DEGREE IN THE DAYTIME. THE OPHTHALMOLOGIST DID A PINHOLE TEST WHICH CLEARED UP THE DISTANCE BLURRINESS. THERE ARE TWO MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RIGHT EYE.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Halo; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 15713506 ↗
  • InjuryNov 2, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING THE IMPLANTATION OF INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) PATIENT EXPERIENCED HALOS AND GLARES AT NIGHT THAT ARE SO BAD AND TRAFFIC SIGNAGE WAS BLURRY. THE PATIENT COULD NOT READ SIGNS UNTIL NEAR. THE OPTOMETRIST TOLD THAT THE LEFT LENS SHIFTED AFTER SURGERY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND PATIENT HAD RIM AND PULSES AT THE CORNER OF THE EYE WHEN LOOKED TO LEFT AND SIGNS ARE HARD TO MAKE OUT UNTIL RIGHT UNDER THEM. THE PATIENT DO NOT DRIVE AT NIGHT AS SHE SEES GLARES AND HALOS AND BLURRY SIGNS AT NIGHT, BUT TO A LESSER DEGREE IN THE DAYTIME. THE OPHTHALMOLOGIST DID A PINHOLE TEST WHICH CLEARED UP THE DISTANCE BLURRINESS. THERE ARE TWO MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE LEFT EYE.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Halo; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 15713223 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 23, 2022Defective Device; Defective Device

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE LENS WAS INSERTED AND REMOVED DUE TO FAULTY LENS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 14469968 ↗

Other Lens, multifocal intraocular devices

All Lens, multifocal intraocular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page