Skip to content

Clareon™ CNA0T0 (REF CNA0T0.110)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Clareon Aspheric Hydrophobic Acrylic IOL with the AutonoMeAutomated Pre-loaded Delivery System · Class 3 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652393539), received between Mar 1, 2023 and Jul 8, 2025 — classified as 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Advance” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Advance4
  • Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare1
  • Failure to Deliver1
  • Failure to Eject1
  • Unintended Ejection1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information3
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 8, 2025Failure to Deliver; Failure to Advance; Failure to Deliver; Failure to Advance

    A NON-HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, LENS STUCK IN DELIVERY SYSTEM, SO SURGEON REMOVED THE LENS FROM THE CARTRIDGE AND PLACED IT WITH A MANUAL INJECTOR. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 22434657 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 19, 2025Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare

    A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANT PROCEDURE THE TRAILING HAPTIC STUCK IN INJECTION. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH UNSPECIFIED LENS ON THE SAME DAY. THERE WAS A PATIENT CONTACT AND NO PATIENT HARM. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22045745 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 15, 2024Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION, THE PLUNGER DIDN¿T ENGAGE PROPERLY WITH THE LENS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED, BUT NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 20450092 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 31, 2023Failure to Advance; Failure to Eject; Failure to Advance; Failure to Eject

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED DURING THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION THE PLUNGER PASSED UNDER THE LENS THROUGH WHICH THE LENS DID NOT EXIT. SINCE THERE WAS NO REPLACEMENT LENS, PROCEEDED TO UNCOVER THE DEVICE AND REMOVED THE LENS AND LOAD IT INTO A CARTRIDGE. THE LENS WAS IN PERFECT CONDITION AND WAS IMPLANTED WITHOUT ANY ISSUES.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 17029417 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 1, 2023Unintended Ejection; Failure to Advance; Unintended Ejection; Failure to Advance

    AN INVENTORY MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST REPORTED THAT DURING A CATARACT EXTRACTION WITH INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE DOCTOR FELT THAT THE INJECTOR WAS FAULTY AS LENS APPEARED TO ADVANCE TOO QUICKLY AND WAS NOT ABLE TO BE INSERTED INTO THE EYE. THERE WAS A PATIENT CONTACT, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SAME DAY. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM AND PATIENT WAS NOT HOSPITALIZED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16458252 ↗

Other Lens, multifocal intraocular devices

All Lens, multifocal intraocular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page