Skip to content

AcrySof® UltraSert® AU00T0 (UDI 00380652394635)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Sterile UV and Blue Light Filtering Acrylic Foldable Single-Piece Posterior Chamber Lenses with the UltraSert® Pre-loaded Delivery System · Class 3 · Implant

All models of AcrySof UltraSert (102)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652394635), received between Aug 31, 2022 and Feb 26, 2025 — classified as 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare2
  • Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material1
  • Device Damaged by Another Device1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Difficult to Advance1
  • Failure to Advance1
  • Failure to Eject1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information3
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 26, 2025Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED DURING INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE LENS WAS FAULTY HAD ISSUE WITH THE LEADING HAPTIC WAS NOTICED. THE LEFT EYE WAS AFFECTED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ON SAME DAY AND THE ISSUE HAD CAUSED A 5-MINUTE DELAY TO THE PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21468177 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 12, 2024Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE LENS WAS INVERTED WHEN RELOADING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19728712 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 15, 2023Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance

    A THEATRE PRACTITIONER REPORTED THAT A LENS WAS STUCK ON THE INJECTOR. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER LENS. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18138947 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 20, 2023Device Damaged by Another Device; Device Damaged by Another Device

    A NURSE REPORTED THAT DURING A CATARACT EXTRACTION WITH INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PERIPHERALLY PART OF THE OPTIC EDGE WAS SHAVED OFF AND COULD NOT BE ASPIRATED WITH IRRIGATION AND ASPIRATION. IT DIDN'T FULLY COME OFF AND WAS HINGED AT THE END OF THE LENS. IT WAS RETAINED INSIDE THE EYE AND WAS NOT VISUALLY SIGNIFICANT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED AND RECEIVED STATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM AND SLIVER OF THE LENS GOT SHAVED OFF WHILE BEING INSERTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16774175 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 30, 2022Difficult to Advance; Failure to Eject; Difficult to Advance; Failure to Eject

    AN OTHER HEALTH PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION, LENS DID NOT ADVANCE, THE PUSHER WAS GLIDING OVER THE LENS. THERE WAS PATIENT CONTACT AND NO PATIENT HARM. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITH A BACK UP LENS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15519071 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 31, 2022Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material

    THE NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT THE BROKEN PIECE OF PLASTIC WAS FOUND ON TOP OF TRAILING HAPTIC. WHEN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO SALVAGE THE LENS, IT SHRIVELED UP AND WAS UNSALVAGEABLE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15326150 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page