Skip to content

AcrySof® UltraSert® AU00T0 (UDI 00380652394659)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Sterile UV and Blue Light Filtering Acrylic Foldable Single-Piece Posterior Chamber Lenses with the UltraSert® Pre-loaded Delivery System · Class 3 · Implant

All models of AcrySof UltraSert (102)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652394659), received between Aug 22, 2022 and Dec 4, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 8 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Advance” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 2 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Advance2
  • Failure to Deliver2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Break1
  • Defective Component1
  • Failure to Eject1
  • Failure to Unfold or Unwrap1
  • Material Deformation1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information5
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Eye Injury1

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 4, 2025Break; Break

    A NON HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED WITH A DESCRIPTION OF INTRAOCULAR LENS HAPTIC BROKEN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND STATED THAT THE LEADING HAPTIC WAS BROKEN. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITH UNSPECIFIED LENS. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23714596 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 11, 2025Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED WITH A DESCRIPTION OF INTRAOCULAR LENS STUCK IN CARTRIDGE / LENS WOULD NOT ADVANCE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 23522262 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 5, 2025Material Deformation; Material Deformation

    A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE LENS DAMAGED DURING LOADING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21526346 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 18, 2025Failure to Deliver; Failure to Advance; Failure to Deliver; Failure to Advance

    A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED WITH A DESCRIPTION OF PLUNGER STUCK WITH UNABLE TO ADVANCE THE LENS. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER IOL. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21393230 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 10, 2025Failure to Deliver; Failure to Deliver

    A NON-HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE LENS WAS PREFILLED WITH NON-COMPANY VISCOELASTIC BEFORE ADMINISTERING TO THE PATIENT. THE LENS GOT CAUGHT IN BETWEEN THE EYE AND THE CARTRIDGE. WHEN DOCTOR WAS PULLING IT OUT, THE HALF OF THE LENS WAS IN THE EYE AND HALF OUT OF THE EYE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21342753 ↗
  • InjurySep 20, 2024Defective Component; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Defective Component; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION PROCEDURE, HE HAD TO WIDEN THE INCISION FOR EVERY SUSPECT DEVICE USED. THE SURGEON STATED THAT THE USUAL INCISION SIZE WAS 2.4 MM, BUT THIS WASN'T ENOUGH FOR THE SUSPECT DEVICE, SO HE HAD TO WIDEN THE INCISION TO 2.5 TO 2.6 MM TO INSERT THE CARTRIDGE TIP INTO THE PATIENT'S EYE. THERE WAS PATIENT CONTACT, BUT NO IMPACT ON THE PATIENT AS THE CATARACT OPERATION WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT ANY PROBLEMS AFTER THE INCISIONS WERE WIDENED. THERE ARE SEVEN MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS COMPLAINT. THIS REPORT IS 5 OF 7.

    Patient problems: Eye Injury

    MAUDE report 20268703 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 20, 2024Material Twisted/Bent; Failure to Eject; Material Twisted/Bent; Failure to Eject

    AN OPTOMETRIST REPORTED THAT WHEN THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS PLACED IN THE PATIENT'S EYE, IT WAS SPLIT. THE IOL WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A BACKUP LENS IN AN INITIAL PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED. WHEN LOADING THE LENS THE INSERTER'S PISTON INITIALLY SLID OVER THE LENS. THE PISTON WAS PULLED BACK AND PUSHED AGAIN, CAUSING THE REAR HAPTIC TO REMAIN STRAIGHT ON TOP OF THE PISTON. IT WAS SHOWN TO THE DOCTOR, AND THE DOCTOR DECIDED TO PROCEED WITH USING THE LENS. THERE WERE PROBLEMS WITH THE HAPTIC, THEREFORE, THE SURGEON HAD TO CUT THE LENS, REMOVE IT AND USE ANOTHER LENS IN SAME PROCEDURE. THIS PROLONGED THE SURGERY TIME. THE REMOVED LENS WAS DISCARDED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 18737450 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 10, 2023Failure to Unfold or Unwrap; Failure to Unfold or Unwrap

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE IOL WAS UNFOLDED INCORRECTLY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER LENS DURING INITIAL PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM REPORTED. THERE ARE TWO FILES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REPORT, THIS IS 1 OF THE 2 FILES.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16520497 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 22, 2022Material Too Rigid or Stiff; Material Too Rigid or Stiff

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING A CATARACT EXTRACTION WITH INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE LENS WAS STIFF. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED AND STATED LENS WAS EXCHANGED WITH ANOTHER LENS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15265189 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page