Skip to content

Clareon™ CC60WF (UDI 00380652397018)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Clareon™ Aspheric UV Absorbing IOL - STERILE UV-Absorbing Hydrophobic Acrylic Foldable Aspheric Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon (1142)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00380652397018), received between Feb 22, 2025 and Feb 22, 2025 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Split, Cut or Torn” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1

Patient problems

  • Corneal Edema1
  • Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss1
  • Eye Injury1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 22, 2025Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    AN ACCOUNT MANAGER REPORTED WITH A DESCRIPTION OF CRACK ON LENS AFTER IMPLANTATION. LENS WAS EXPLANTED IN A INITIAL PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED AS SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO IMPLANT A COMPANY +29.5 IOL USING A COMPANY CARTRIDGE, BUT THE LENS WAS FOUND TO BE FRACTURED NEAR THE OPTIC. AFTER CONSULTING ANOTHER PHYSICIAN, THE LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER COMPANY +29.5 USING A CARTRIDGE (UNCERTAIN IF IT WAS THE SAME ONE). HOWEVER, THE SECOND LENS ALSO SHOWED A FRACTURE NEAR THE OPTIC CENTER. DUE TO IRIS TRAUMA FROM THE FIRST LENS REMOVAL AND NO ADDITIONAL +29.5 IOLS AVAILABLE, THE DECISION WAS MADE TO LEAVE THE FRACTURED LENS IN SITU AND CLOSE THE CASE. ONE WEEK POST-OP, THE PATIENT REPORTED 20/80 VISION, WITH CORNEAL EDEMA LIKELY CONTRIBUTING, POSSIBLY DUE TO ENDOTHELIAL DAMAGE, IRIS TRAUMA, OR THE FRACTURED OPTIC.

    Patient problems: Corneal Edema; Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss; Eye Injury; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 21440701 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page