Skip to content

Clareon CNWET0 (UDI 00380652405126)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Clareon Vivity · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon (1142)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652405126), received between Feb 2, 2023 and Mar 18, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Defective Device” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Defective Device1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1

Patient problems

  • Halo2
  • Insufficient Information2
  • Visual Disturbances2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 18, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, LENS WAS EXPLANTED AT SECONDARY PROCEDURE DUE TO DISLOCATED IOL. THE IOL WAS REPLACED WITH UNSPECIFIED MONOFOCAL LENS WITHIN A MONTH AFTER INITIAL PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21631711 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 25, 2024Defective Device; Defective Device

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING SURGERY, THEY NOTICED THAT THE LENS WAS ROTATED IN THE CARTRIDGE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20537238 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 2, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A CONSUMER REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT STATED THAT IOL IS HORRIBLE. ALL IMAGES BEYOND 10 FEET HAVE A SHADOW AND HALOS DURING MODERATE DAYLIGHT ARE ALMOST UNBEARABLE MAKING IT VERY DIFFICULT TO DRIVE. HYDRATING DROPS DID NOTHING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND STATED THAT, THE PATIENT SPECIFICALLY DISCUSSED THE TECHNICIAN DRY EYE CONCERN WITH THE DOCTOR. HE SAID HE WASN'T REALLY CONCERNED. WE DISCUSSED AVAILABLE PRESCRIPTION STRENGTH DROPS, BUT HE INDICATED HE DIDN'T THINK THAT THE PATIENT WAS A GOOD CANDIDATE FOR THEM. THE PATIENT SENT A FOLLOW UP NOTE TO THE DOCTOR AFTER MY LAST OFFICE VISIT, AFTER WHICH THE PATIENT WAS DISCUSSED WITH THE TECHNICIAN. TECHNICIAN TOLD PATIENT TO CONTINUE THE VITAMIN SUPPLEMENTS AND PUT DROPS IN MY EYES EVERY TWO HOURS. IT MADE NO DIFFERENCE. ANOTHER TECHNICIAN RESPONDED TO MY CALL AND GAVE ME A LECTURE ON HOW THE PATIENT HAD DRY EYES. THE PATIENT STILL USE DROPS (PF FREE) OCCASIONALLY, AND TAKE THE SUPPLEMENTS FOUR TABLETS A DAILY. THERE ARE TWO MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE LEFT EYE.

    Patient problems: Halo; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 16281806 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 2, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A CONSUMER REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT STATED THAT IOL IS HORRIBLE. ALL IMAGES BEYOND 10 FEET HAVE A SHADOW AND HALOS DURING MODERATE DAYLIGHT ARE ALMOST UNBEARABLE MAKING IT VERY DIFFICULT TO DRIVE. HYDRATING DROPS DID NOTHING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND STATED THAT, THE PATIENT SPECIFICALLY DISCUSSED THE TECHNICIAN DRY EYE CONCERN WITH THE DOCTOR. HE SAID HE WASN'T REALLY CONCERNED. WE DISCUSSED AVAILABLE PRESCRIPTION STRENGTH DROPS, BUT HE INDICATED HE DIDN'T THINK THAT THE PATIENT WAS A GOOD CANDIDATE FOR THEM. THE PATIENT SENT A FOLLOW UP NOTE TO THE DOCTOR AFTER MY LAST OFFICE VISIT, AFTER WHICH THE PATIENT WAS DISCUSSED WITH THE TECHNICIAN. TECHNICIAN TOLD PATIENT TO CONTINUE THE VITAMIN SUPPLEMENTS AND PUT DROPS IN MY EYES EVERY TWO HOURS. IT MADE NO DIFFERENCE. ANOTHER TECHNICIAN RESPONDED TO MY CALL AND GAVE ME A LECTURE ON HOW THE PATIENT HAD DRY EYES. THE PATIENT STILL USE DROPS (PF FREE) OCCASIONALLY, AND TAKE THE SUPPLEMENTS FOUR TABLETS A DAILY. THERE ARE TWO MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RIGHT EYE.

    Patient problems: Halo; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 16281804 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page