Skip to content

Clareon CNWET0 (UDI 00380652405195)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Clareon Vivity · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon (1142)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652405195), received between Jun 9, 2023 and Apr 6, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 2 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
  • Material Twisted/Bent1

Patient problems

  • Blurred Vision3
  • Insufficient Information2
  • Corneal Abrasion1
  • Visual Disturbances1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 6, 2026Material Twisted/Bent

    A NURSE REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, WHEN LENS WAS IMPLANTED INTO THE PATIENT'S EYE SURGEON STOPPED ADVANCING AND REMOVED THE LENS AS SHE SUSPECTED THE LENS HAPTIC WAS DAMAGED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED BUT IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24789785 ↗
  • InjuryMar 30, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED BLURRY VISION, GLARE AND STREAKING IN DIFFERENT LIGHTING. IOL WAS EXCHANGED FOR NON-COMPANY LENS MODEL 28 DAYS AFTER THE INITIAL IMPLANT PROCEDURE. CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT WAS REPORTED AS STACKING OF POST LASIK CORNEAL ABERRATION WITH COMPANY IOL ABERRATION. THERE ARE TWO MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RIGHT EYE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND STATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Corneal Abrasion; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 24715431 ↗
  • InjuryMar 25, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THERE WAS DECREASED CONTRAST, POOR QUALITY AND BLURRY VISION. THE LENS WAS EXCHANGED WITH AN UNKNOWN MONOFOCAL LENS AFTER THE INITIAL IMPLANT PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision

    MAUDE report 24694908 ↗
  • InjuryJul 21, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, EXPLANTED IOL WITH REASON IOL DISLOCATION WITH VISION. THE LENS WAS REPLACED WITH MONOFOCAL LENS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 22559635 ↗
  • InjuryJun 9, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT COMPLAINS OF BLURRED VISION AND NOTICED DISLOCATED IOL AS IT FELL INTO VITREOUS. THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED FOR ANOTHER LENS AND HAD PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY (PPV), LIMBAL RELAXING INCISIONS (LRI), BINOCULAR INDIRECT OPHTHALMOMICROSCOPE (BIOM). THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM REPORTED AND SYMPTOMS WERE RESOLVED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision

    MAUDE report 17100115 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page