Skip to content

Clareon CNWET0 (UDI 00380652405348)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Clareon Vivity · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon (1142)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652405348), received between Mar 13, 2024 and Feb 27, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Scratched Material” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Scratched Material2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Break1
  • Device Damaged by Another Device1
  • Failure to Deliver1
  • Product Quality Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Insufficient Information2
  • Blurred Vision1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 27, 2026Failure to Deliver

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE LENS DID NOT ADVANCE FULLY OUT OF THE CARTRIDGE. PATIENT CONTACT WAS MADE. ANOTHER UNSPECIFIED LENS WAS USED, AND THERE WERE NO ISSUES FOR THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED BY STATING, THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24468986 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 15, 2025Break; Break

    A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, ONCE IMPLANTED IT WAS FOUND IN THE CAPSULAR BAG THAT THE HAPTIC WAS CRACKED. THE IOL WAS EXPLANTED DURING INITIAL PROCEDURE AND UNSPECIFIED LENS WAS SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23300066 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 4, 2025Scratched Material; Scratched Material

    A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, SCRATCH WAS NOTED ON LENS UPON INSERTION. LENS WAS EXPLANTED IN INITIAL PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH BACK UP LENS WITH THE SAME DIOPTER AND SERIES.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21774116 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 7, 2025Product Quality Problem; Scratched Material; Product Quality Problem; Scratched Material

    A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION PROCEDURE, THE LENS WAS EXTRACTED AND NOT USED AS IT WAS DAMAGED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION STATED THAT LENS WAS FOUND TO HAVE A LARGE DEFECT INTO THE CENTER OF THE OPTIC. THE DEFECT IS AWAY FROM WHERE THE PLUNGER COMES INTO CONTACT WITH THE LENS. THE LENS HAD TO BE EXPLANTED DURING INITIAL PROCEDURE AND BACK UP LENS USED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21548056 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 9, 2024Device Damaged by Another Device; Device Damaged by Another Device

    AN OTHER HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING SURGERY, THEY NOTICED THAT THE LENS BROKE IN THE IMPLANTATION CARTRIDGE WHILE INJECTING INTO THE INJECTOR. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM AND PATIENT WAS FEELING WELL. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20176530 ↗
  • InjuryMar 13, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE,LENS WAS EXPLANTED AT SECONDARY PROCEDURE DUE TO PATIENT REASON WRONG IOL POWER/TORICITY. CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT REPORTED TO BE RESIDUAL REFRACTIVE ERROR/POOR VISION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED, BUT NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 18895776 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page