Skip to content

Clareon CNW0T4 (UDI 00380652410007)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · CLAREON BLF TORIC · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon (1142)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652410007), received between Jul 25, 2024 and Apr 10, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
  • Device Markings/Labelling Problem1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information2
  • Blurred Vision1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 10, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT AFTER THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION SURGERY, THE LENS WAS ROTATED TO 30 OR 40 DEGREE ON POST OPERATIVE DAY 1. THE LENSES WAS IMPLANTED ON HIGH MYOPE PATIENTS WITH VERTICAL LENS PLACEMENT. IN 2 OF 3 CASES A CAPSULAR TENSION RING WAS USED DURING THE SURGERY TO REDUCE THE ROTATION OF THE LENS IN THESE PATIENTS HOWEVER, THE LENS WAS NOT ROTATED IN ONE EYE AND IT WAS ROTATED IN OTHER EYES. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED, YET NO NEW INFORMATION RECEIVED. THERE ARE THREE FILES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REPORT. THIS IS 2 OF 3.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24839816 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 30, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT AFTER AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE LENS WAS ROTATED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED BUT IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT. THERE ARE THREE MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REPORT. THIS IS 1 OF 3.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 24728616 ↗
  • InjuryJul 25, 2024Device Markings/Labelling Problem; Device Markings/Labelling Problem

    A FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE , THE PATIENT HAD A 12.0 LENS IMPLANTED INSTEAD OF THE PLANNED 16.0D LENS. ON DAY OF SURGERY, LENS WAS VERIFIED BUT THE OUTSIDE LENS BOX WAS LABELED CORRECTLY. THE PATIENT HAD DECREASED VISION AND THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED AND EXCHANGED WITH 16.5D LENS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED THAT CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT WAS MENTIONED AS THERE WAS NO IMPROVEMENT IN VISION AFTER ONE MONTH RECORDS WAS CHECKED AND WRONG SIZE LENS HAD BEEN PLACED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision

    MAUDE report 19828772 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page