Skip to content

Clareon CNW0T4 (UDI 00380652410045)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · CLAREON BLF TORIC · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon (1142)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652410045), received between Mar 14, 2025 and Feb 12, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Scratched Material” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Scratched Material2
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information2
  • Blurred Vision1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 12, 2026Scratched Material

    A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, A SCRATCH ON THE IOL OPTIC WAS OBSERVED AFTER IMPLANTATION, THE SURGEON EXPLANTED THE LENS AND REPLACED IT WITH A NEW IOL.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24320855 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 5, 2025Scratched Material; Scratched Material

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, IT WAS OBSERVED SCRATCH OR MARK ON OPTIC. THE LENS HAS CENTRAL SPLINES THAT INTERFERE WITH THE VISUAL AXIS. THE LENS WAS REMOVED AND ANOTHER LENS WAS IMPLANTED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22152502 ↗
  • InjuryMay 2, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) PROCEDURE, THE LENS WAS ROTATED IN PATIENT AFTER DAY ONE OF POST OPERATION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED THAT 32 YEAR PATIENT WHO HAD HIGH MYOPIA WAS IMPLANTED WITH THE COMPANY LENS. DURING DAY 1 POST OPERATION EXPERIENCED BLURRY NEAR AND DISTANCE VISION. NO CORNEAL EDEMA FOUND. THE SURGEON EXPLAINED PATIENT ABOUT HIS EYE BEING ABNORMALLY LARGE AND TOLD HIM TO COME BACK AFTER 2 WEEKS FOR IOL ROTATION. CAME BACK AFTER WEEK AND WAS OK WITH WEARING GLASSES. POST OP 17 DAYS THE LENS WAS ROTATED 54 DEGREES AND AFTER ONE MONTH 55 DEGREES. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED THAT IN PATIENTS OPINION LENS CONTRIBUTED THE EVENT. THERE ARE TWO MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS FILE. THIS REPORT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RIGHT EYE.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision

    MAUDE report 21952084 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 14, 2025Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED DURING INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE HAPTIC BENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ON SAME DAY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED AS LENS WAS REMOVED DURING INITIAL PROCEDURE BECAUSE BACK HAPTIC WAS STUCK TO ITSELF.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21605476 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page