Skip to content

Clareon CNW0T5 (UDI 00380652410519)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · CLAREON BLF TORIC · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon (1142)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652410519), received between Jun 22, 2023 and Feb 20, 2025 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Scratched Material1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 20, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    A SURGEON REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING A FEMTOSECOND-LASER-ASSISTED CATARACT SURGERY (FLACS) AND INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE IN A HIGH MYOPE PATIENT, NEXT DAY (24 HOURS) SURGEON FOUND THAT THE IOL TO BE ROTATED BY A GOOD 40 DEGREES AND AT ONE WEEK IT REMAINED SIMILAR. THERE WAS NO HISTORY OF ANY EYE RUBBING OR TRAUMA ON THE DAY OF SURGERY. SURGEON ADVISED AN IOL ROTATION TO THE PATIENT. HOWEVER, THE PATIENT WAS NOT KEEN ON A SECOND INTRAOPERATIVE INTERVENTION AND WAS OK TO WEAR WHATEVER THE FINAL REFRACTION WAS, ALTHOUGH PATIENT WAS NOT HAPPY ABOUT IT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN WAS RECEIVED AND STATED THAT PATIENT WAS PLANNED FOR 64 DEGREE PLACEMENT BUT AFTER 24 HOURS OF IOL IMPLANTATION HAD 48 DEGREE ROTATION 2.00 DIOPTER CHANGE IN CYLINDRICAL. TH PATIENT WAS WILLING TO ACCEPT THE GLASSES AND WAS NOT KEEN ON IOL ROTATION.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21421784 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 22, 2023Scratched Material; Scratched Material

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, SCRATCH OR FOREIGN MATERIAL ON THE SURFACE OF THE INSERTED INTRAOCULAR LENS AFTER SURGERY, THE SAMPLE WAS NOT AVAILABLE AS LENS REMAINED IN THE PATIENT'S EYE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17181549 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page