Skip to content

Clareon CNW0T5 (UDI 00380652410656)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · CLAREON BLF TORIC · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon (1142)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652410656), received between Mar 7, 2023 and Apr 16, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Scratched Material” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Scratched Material2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Failure to Advance1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 16, 2026Scratched Material

    A NURSE REPORTED THAT DURING THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION SURGERY, THE LENS WAS SCRATCHED AFTER IMPLANTING IT. THERE WAS PATIENT CONTACT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24895837 ↗
  • InjuryAug 8, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT WAS NOT HAPPY WITH THE RESULT. THE IOL WAS REPLACED WITH A NON-COMPANY MONOFOCAL IOL AFTER THE INITIAL IMPLANT PROCEDURE. THE CLINICAL REASON PROVIDED WAS RESIDUAL ASTIGMATISM. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 22748562 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 4, 2025Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE LENS BECAME STUCK IN THE DELIVERY SYSTEM. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 22143452 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 7, 2023Scratched Material; Scratched Material

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT DURING A CATARACT EXTRACTION WITH AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE IOL WAS FOUND DAMAGED IN THE PATIENT'S EYE AFTER IMPLANTED THE LENS. THERE WAS A CROSS-SHAPED SCRATCH IN THE LOWER PART OF THE OPTIC AROUND THE HAPTIC. AFTER THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED USING THE IOL CUTTER IN THE EYE, A BACK-UP LENS OF THE SAME POWER WAS IMPLANTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED STATING THERE WAS NO IMPACT ON PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16493921 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page