Skip to content

Clareon CNW0T5 (UDI 00380652410717)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · CLAREON BLF TORIC · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon (1142)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652410717), received between Aug 22, 2024 and Jan 13, 2026 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Discolored” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Discolored2
  • Material Twisted/Bent1
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1
  • Scratched Material1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Halo1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Visual Disturbances1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 13, 2026Material Discolored

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THERE WAS WHITEISH APPEARANCE ON THE LENS. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED AND STATED, THE FINDING OF THE IOL WAS CONTINUING EVEN AFTER THE SURGERY. THERE WAS NO IMPACT ON THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24053256 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 2, 2025Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED DURING INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE HAPTIC WAS DAMAGED AFTER IMPLANTING THE LENS. THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED DURING INITIAL PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 22945471 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 29, 2025Material Discolored; Material Discolored

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED ABOUT AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) STATING DURING PROCEDURE THERE WAS A PROBLEM WITH THE IOL COATING (THE IOL LOOKED BLUE) AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT PRODUCT REPLACEMENT LENS STILL REMAINED IN THE PATIENT EYE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM SO FAR. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED, BUT NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21925442 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 22, 2024Scratched Material; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Scratched Material; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, AFTER IMPLANTATION OF AN IOL IN THE BAG A SCRATCH WAS FOUND IN THE IOL. THE LENS IMPLANTATION WAS SET UP BY A SUPPORTING DOCTOR, SO THE SURGEON DID NOT SEE THE IOL SETTING PROCESS. DURING IMPLANTATION HE/SHE FELT RESISTANCE A BIT. THEN HE/SHE REALIZED THAT THERE WAS A SCRATCH IN THE IOL. SINCE THE IOL WAS IMPLANTED IN THE BAG ACCURATELY, CONSIDERING THE RISK OF DECREASED VISUAL ACUITY THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED BY ROTATING THE IOL 180 DEGREES WHILE STILL IN THE PATIENT'S EYE, SO THAT THE SCRATCHED PART WAS FACING UPWARD (TOWARDS THE PATIENT'S HEAD). THE PATIENT FELT LIKE HALO ONLY FOR THIS EYE AND THE SURGEON THOUGHT THAT THIS MIGHT BE DUE TO THE SCRATCH OF IOL AND THE PATIENT WAS PLANNED TO BE MONITORED.

    Patient problems: Halo; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 20025992 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page