Skip to content

Clareon CCWTT0 (UDI 00380652413749)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Clareon PanOptix UVA · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon (1142)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
10
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652413749), received between Oct 27, 2022 and Sep 12, 2025 — classified as 6 injuries, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem5
  • Break1
  • Crack1
  • Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material1
  • Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Failure to Deliver1
  • Scratched Material1

Patient problems

  • Blurred Vision4
  • Insufficient Information3
  • Visual Disturbances2
  • Capsular Bag Tear1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 12, 2025Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Failure to Deliver; Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Failure to Deliver

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED STATING THAT ALL LENSES THAT WERE IMPLANTED DUE TO LENS ISSUES WERE THE SAME DIOPTER.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23036944 ↗
  • InjuryJun 20, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT, AFTER INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTATION SURGERY, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED BLURRY VISION. HENCE THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. THE CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT WAS PATIENT NEEDED A TORIC LENS TO CORRECT FOR ASTIGMATISM.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision

    MAUDE report 22299320 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 5, 2025Break; Break

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT DURING INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, HAPTIC TORN OR BROKEN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21525540 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 25, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, PATIENT COULD NOT TOLERATE RINGS AND HALOS. THE LENS WAS EXCHANGED FOR AN UNKNOWN ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INTRAOCULAR LENS (ATIOL) AFTER THE INITIAL IMPLANT PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 21457268 ↗
  • InjuryNov 13, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON-HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED DECREASED DISTANCE VISION. THE LENS WAS EXCHANGED FOR ANOTHER LENS MODEL 02 MONTHS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT WAS MENTIONED AS MYOPIC OUTCOME. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 20675158 ↗
  • InjurySep 4, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT AFTER SURGERY, THE PATIENT HAD MALADAPTATION. THE LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER UNSPECIFIED LENS IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision

    MAUDE report 20134408 ↗
  • InjuryAug 7, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, IOL DISLOCATED INTO VITREOUS CAVITY AND UNABLE TO FLOAT BACK INTO ANTERIOR CHAMBER (A/C) AND POSTERIOR CAPSULE WAS RUPTURED. THE PATIENT WAS SENT TO A RETINA SPECIALIST, PATIENT HAD VITRECTOMY AND PARS PLANA LENSECTOMY OD (EXPLANT OF DISLOCATED IOL, SUTURED AND LASER). THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED FOR ANOTHER COMPANY LENS. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Capsular Bag Tear

    MAUDE report 19926347 ↗
  • InjuryNov 23, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED STATING THAT THE PATIENT HAD UNCLEAR VISION AND POSITIVE DYSPHOTOPSIA AND THE CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT WAS MECHANICAL COMPLICATION OF INTRAOCULAR LENS.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 18198148 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 13, 2023Crack; Scratched Material; Crack; Scratched Material

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE LENS WAS PERIPHERALLY SCRATCHED AND CRACKED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 16362125 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 27, 2022Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material

    A MATERIALS MANAGER REPORTED THAT DURING A CATARACT EXTRACTION WITH AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THEY FOUND SMUDGED LENS AND IT WAS REMOVED BY IRRIGATION AND ASPIRATION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED, BUT FURTHER NO INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15681165 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page