Skip to content

AcrySof® IQ PanOptix® Toric Trifocal IOL TFNT30 (REF TFNT30U235)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof® IQ PanOptix® Toric Trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) are ultraviolet absorbing and blue light filtering foldable multifocal IOLs · Class 3 · Implant

All models of AcrySof IQ PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL (165)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652415590), received between Dec 1, 2021 and Jan 7, 2022 — classified as 3 injuries.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3

Patient problems

  • Visual Disturbances2
  • Visual Impairment2
  • Halo1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 7, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT VISION WAS WORSE THAN BEFORE SURGERY AND ALSO HAD DYSPHOTOPSIA. THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED WITH AN ALTERNATE IOL APPROXIMATELY 6 MONTHS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED AND STATED THAT. THE PATIENT ALSO EXPERIENCED HALOS, GLARE AND POOR VISION. THE CONTRIBUTORY CAUSE OF THE EVENT WAS LENS.

    Patient problems: Halo; Visual Disturbances; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 13193242 ↗
  • InjuryDec 28, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED GLARE SENSITIVITY. THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE THREE MONTHS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL IMPLANT PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 13093610 ↗
  • InjuryDec 1, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED AFTER AN INTRAOCULAR LENS WAS IMPLANTED, THE PATIENT VISION WAS WORSE. THE LENS WAS EXCHANGED FOR ANOTHER LENS SIX MONTH AFTER INITIAL IMPLANTATION IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. THE CLINICAL REASON FOR THE EXPLANT WAS GIVEN AS DYSPHOTOPSIA. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED AND RECEIVED STATING THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED GLARE AND WAS NOT HOSPITALIZED FOR ANY OF THE EVENTS. THE PROGNOSIS WAS GOOD.

    Patient problems: Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 12909229 ↗

Other Lens, multifocal intraocular devices

All Lens, multifocal intraocular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page