Skip to content

AcrySof™ IQ PanOptix™ Toric UV IOL TFAT30 (REF TFAT30.175)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof® IQ PanOptix® Toric Trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) are ultraviolet absorbing foldable multifocal IOLs · Class 3 · Implant

All models of AcrySof IQ PanOptix Toric UV IOL (120)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652418652), received between May 25, 2021 and Aug 26, 2026 — classified as 5 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Defective Device” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 1 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem5
  • Defective Device1

Patient problems

  • Blurred Vision3
  • Visual Impairment2
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Visual Disturbances1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 26, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A non-health care professional reported that following an intraocular lens (IOL) implantation procedure, the patient experienced poor vision and halos. Subsequently the lens was removed and replaced with an unspecified monofocal in a secondary procedure. The clinical reason for explant was intolerable to contrast and halos. Additional information has been requested but is not available at the time of this report. There are two Medical Device Reports associated with this report. This is 2 of 2.

    Patient problems: Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 50448578 ↗
  • InjuryJul 28, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT AFTER AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED BLURRY VISION AND ENHANCEMENT OF ASTIGMATISM DUE TO LASIK BY MULTI FOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS. THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 15122119 ↗
  • InjurySep 23, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED THAT THE IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLACEMENT OF THE LENSES, THE ASTIGMATISM WAS NOT CORRECTED. THE DOCTOR DID YAG LASER WHICH DID NOT HELP. LATER THE TOUCH UP LASIK WAS DONE WHICH CORRECTED THE RESIDUAL ASTIGMATISM BUT THE INTERMITTENT BLURRY AND HAZY VISION CONTINUES. DOCTOR PLACED THE PUNCTUAL PLUGS ON (B)(6) 2021, PATIENT STILL HAVING INTERMITTENT GOOD AND BAD VISION, AND MOSTLY BAD. SOME DAY¿S PATIENT READ NEWSPAPER AND STREET SIGN AND SOME DAYS PATIENT CAN'T. PATIENTS POOR VISION CANNOT BE CORRECTED WITH GLASSES. PATIENT HAS NOT BEEN DIAGNOSED WITH MACULAR EDEMA, BUT IS GOING ON (B)(6) FOR FURTHER TESTING.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Blurred Vision; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 12518028 ↗
  • InjuryAug 27, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NURSE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED POOR VISION WHICH WAS AFFECTING DAILY LIVING ACTIVITIES, ESPECIALLY DRIVING. THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE APPROXIMATELY 7 MONTHS AFTER THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision

    MAUDE report 12376641 ↗
  • InjuryAug 16, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NURSE REPORTED THAT POST IMPLANTATION OF AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) THE PATIENT WAS NOT SATISFIED WITH RESULTS. POST IMPLANTATION AFTER THREE MONTHS THE LENS WAS REPLACED WITH OTHER LENS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12325063 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 25, 2021Defective Device; Defective Device

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED VIA IOL REPLY CARD THAT AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS DAMAGED AND LENS WAS EXPLANTED DURING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11878347 ↗

Other Lens, multifocal intraocular devices

All Lens, multifocal intraocular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page