Skip to content

AcrySof™ IQ PanOptix™ Toric UV IOL TFAT30 (REF TFAT30.300)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof® IQ PanOptix® Toric Trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) are ultraviolet absorbing foldable multifocal IOLs · Class 3 · Implant

All models of AcrySof IQ PanOptix Toric UV IOL (120)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652418904), received between Dec 10, 2021 and Jul 10, 2023 — classified as 2 injuries.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2

Patient problems

  • Blurred Vision1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 10, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT, AFTER INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTATION SURGERY, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED BLURRY DISTANT VISION. HENCE THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH MONOFOCAL LENS IN SECONDARY PROCEDURE. THE CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT WAS PATIENT UNHAPPY WITH VISUAL OUTCOME.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision

    MAUDE report 17287656 ↗
  • InjuryDec 10, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT AFTER AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS IMPLANTED, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED UNKNOWN ISSUE. THE LENS WAS EXCHANGED FOR A DIFFERENT LENS ONE MONTH AFTER INITIAL IMPLANTATION. THE CLINICAL REASON FOR THE EXPLANT WAS POOR VISUAL RESULTS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED AND RECEIVED STATING THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM AND THE PROGNOSIS WAS GOOD. THE PATIENT WAS NOT HOSPITALIZED FOR THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 12978891 ↗

Other Lens, multifocal intraocular devices

All Lens, multifocal intraocular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page