Skip to content

AcrySof™ IQ PanOptix™ Toric UV IOL TFAT40 (REF TFAT40.185)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof® IQ PanOptix® Toric Trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) are ultraviolet absorbing foldable multifocal IOLs · Class 3 · Implant

All models of AcrySof IQ PanOptix Toric UV IOL (120)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652419208), received between Aug 16, 2021 and Jul 1, 2024 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Positioning Failure” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Positioning Failure1

Patient problems

  • Blurred Vision2
  • Visual Disturbances2
  • Visual Impairment2
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Dizziness1
  • Eye Pain1
  • Foreign Body Sensation in Eye1
  • Halo1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 1, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT'S VISION WAS LIKE SEEING THROUGH VASELINE. THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED FOR ANOTHER LENS MODEL FOLLOWING THE INITIAL IMPLANT PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 19643008 ↗
  • InjuryJul 4, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING A CATARACT EXTRACTION WITH INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT COMPLAINT OF DECREASED VISION. THE DECREASED VISION WAS AT A DISTANCE AND CONSTANT AND ASSOCIATED WITH FOREIGN BODY SENSATION AND PHOTOPHOBIA. THE DECREASED VISION HAS BEEN PRESENT FOR 1 WEEK AND PATIENT BEING TREATED LUBRICATE DRY EYES AND ANTI-INFLAMMATORIES. IN POST OFF 2ND VISIT PATIENT COMPLAINT OF FOREIGN BODY SENSATION. THE YAG (YTTRIUM ALUMINUM GARNET) LASER POSTERIOR CAPSULOTOMY PERFORMED FOR POSTERIOR CAPSULAR OPACIFICATION. POST YAG PATIENT COMPLAINT ABOUT INTERMEDIATE WAS BLURRY AND HAS TROUBLE FOCUSING, CAUSING DIZZINESS. THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED STATING PATIENT HAD COMPLICATED CATARACT EXTRACTION WITH INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE INITIALLY. PATIENT HAD AN EXPLANT, ANTERIOR VITRECTOMY, INFERIOR FOVEA SPLITTING RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT (RRD). FOLLOWED BY A PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY AND PATIENT NOW DOING WELL.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Blurred Vision; Dizziness; Eye Pain; Foreign Body Sensation in Eye; Retinal Detachment; Visual Disturbances; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 14907325 ↗
  • InjuryMay 29, 2022Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure

    A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED AN EXPLANT HAS BEEN PLANNED DUE TO NO LONGER CAN SEE CLEAR OUT OF OS, FEELS ALWAYS BLURRY AND NOT CLEAR. THE LENS WAS OFF POSITIONED AND SHIFTED UPWARDS, THEREFORE TO ATTAIN THE CORRECT VISION THE LENS WAS ALTERED WITH MORE ASTIGMATISM THEN WANTED AT A +1.50. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 14538688 ↗
  • InjuryAug 16, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NURSE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION THE PATIENT WAS SEEING HALOS. THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED FOR A DIFFERENT IOL APPROXIMATELY AFTER 3 MONTHS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Halo

    MAUDE report 12328428 ↗

Other Lens, multifocal intraocular devices

All Lens, multifocal intraocular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page