Skip to content

AcrySof™ IQ PanOptix™ UV IOL TFAT00 (REF TFAT00.150)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · The AcrySof® IQ PanOptix® UV Absorbing Trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) are ultraviolet absorbing foldable multifocal IOLs · Class 3 · Implant

All models of AcrySof IQ PanOptix UV IOL (28)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652429610), received between Dec 24, 2022 and Apr 12, 2023 — classified as 2 injuries.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2

Patient problems

  • Blurred Vision2
  • Eye Pain1
  • Visual Disturbances1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 12, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE THREE YEARS AFTER, PHYSICIAN HAS TRIED SEVERAL PROCEDURES OR DROPS HOWEVER THE PATIENT STILL COULD NOT DRIVE SAFELY AT NIGHT BECAUSE OF THE STRIATIONS OF THE LIGHTS. THE PATIENT ALSO TRIED YELLOW GLASSES BUT THEY DID NOT HELP. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 16729005 ↗
  • InjuryDec 24, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED FOLLOWING THE INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTATION THE VISION WAS BLUR IN ALL DISTANCES AND ALSO HAD HYPEROPIC SURPRISE CAUSING ASTHENOPIA. HENCE THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Eye Pain

    MAUDE report 16045785 ↗

Other Lens, multifocal intraocular devices

All Lens, multifocal intraocular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page