Skip to content

Clareon CCW0T3 (UDI 00380652431842)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · CLAREON TORIC UVA · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon (1142)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652431842), received between May 23, 2023 and Apr 24, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Break1
  • Defective Device1
  • Dent in Material1
  • Failure to Deliver1
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1
  • Product Quality Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • Insufficient Information2
  • Visual Impairment2
  • Blurred Vision1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 24, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED BLURRY VISION. THE LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A MONOFOCAL LENS IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. THE CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT WAS RESIDUAL MYOPIA. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED BUT IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 24982034 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 18, 2026Break

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED AND STATED, THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY. THERE WAS PATIENT CONTACT AND NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24625936 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 14, 2025Failure to Deliver; Failure to Deliver

    A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT, DURING INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTATION SURGERY, THE LENS WOULD NOT DEPLOY. THERE WAS PATIENT CONTACT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED STATING THAT, THE INJECTOR CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENT AS THE TIP THAT PUSHES THE LENS OUT WAS BENT TOO MUCH. IT WAS FIXED AND NOW NO ISSUE WITH THE INJECTOR. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER LENS OF SAME MODEL AND DIOPTER AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT HAM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22493761 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 13, 2025Product Quality Problem; Product Quality Problem

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED DURING INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON REPORTED THAT THERE WERE MARKS ON TORIC INTRAOCULAR LENS ARE NOT LINED UP WITH EACH OTHER. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THE MARKS WERE ABOUT 30 DEGREES OFF FROM ONE ANOTHER AND SUPERIOR MARK WAS LINED UP AS EXPECTED AT OR AROUND HAPTIC, INFERIOR MARK WAS ABOUT 30 DEGREES OFF AND DESCRIBED AS "GAPPED OUT". IT WAS STATED THAT THE SECOND LENS WAS OPENED AND THE MARKS WERE LINED UP AS EXPECTED. THE LENS WAS CUT OUT AND REPLACED WITH THE BACKUP LENS TO COMPLETE THE SURGERY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ON SAME DAY WITHOUT ANY HARM TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22203208 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 24, 2025Dent in Material; Dent in Material

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, NOTED JAGGED EDGES AFTER LENS WAS INSERTED, WHICH WOULD HAVE CAUSED THE PATIENT INJURY IF ROTATED. SUBSEQUENTLY THE LENS WAS REMOVED DURING INITIAL PROCEDURE AND COMPLETED WITH COMPANY LENS OF SAME MODEL AND DIOPTER. THERE WAS NO ISSUE OR HARM TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED STATING THAT IN THE SURGEON¿S OPINION LENS DAMAGED AT MANUFACTURING, CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21678008 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 4, 2024Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT DURING THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE LENS HAD TEAR WHICH WAS NOTICED AFTER INSERTION. THE LENS WAS REMOVED AND IMPLANTED THE NEW LENS DURING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20372551 ↗
  • InjuryMay 2, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED POOR VISION. THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. THE CLINICAL REASON FOR THE EXPLANT WAS POST OPERATION HYPEROPIA. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 19228477 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 23, 2023Defective Device; Defective Device

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT, THERE WAS DAMAGE OF IOL. THE LENS LEFT IN THE PATIENTS EYE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 16982132 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page