Skip to content

Clareon CCWET4 (UDI 00380652455657)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Clareon Vivity Toric UVA · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon (1142)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652455657), received between Aug 10, 2022 and Sep 10, 2024 — classified as 4 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material1
  • Malposition of Device1
  • Scratched Material1

Patient problems

  • Blurred Vision4
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Visual Disturbances1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 10, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED BLURRY VISION, VISION WORSE THAN BEFORE IOL SURGERY. CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT PATIENT COULD NOT FUNCTION WITH LENS. THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED FOR ANOTHER LENS MODEL 4 MONTHS 16 DAYS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL IMPLANT PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 20178580 ↗
  • InjuryJun 19, 2023Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED BLURRED VISION. THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED FOR ANOTHER LENS MODEL 2 MONTHS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL IMPLANT PROCEDURE. CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT WAS SIGNIFICANTLY ROTATED/OTHER MECHANICAL COMPLICATION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision

    MAUDE report 17151108 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 8, 2023Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Scratched Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Scratched Material

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING SURGERY, WHEN INTRAOCULAR LENS WAS IMPLANTED, A SCRATCH WAS NOTICED. IN ADDITION TO SCRATCH THERE SEEMED TO BE SOMETHING ELSE THAT WAS INJECTED WITH THE LENS. THE SURGEON THOUGHT THAT IT WAS THE HAPTIC BUT SURGEON FELT BOTH HAPTICS WERE INTACT. THE LENS AND THE FOREIGN MATERIAL WAS REMOVED AND WAS AVAILABLE FOR INVESTIGATION. NO FURTHER INFORMATION EXPECTED AS REPORTER UNWILLING TO BE CONTACTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 17085517 ↗
  • InjuryMay 9, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NURSE REPORTED THAT AFTER IMPLANTATION OF INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL), THE PATIENT HAD BLURRY VISION. THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS. THE CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT WAS POST - LASIK, MYOPIC SURPRISE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED, BUT NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision

    MAUDE report 16893985 ↗
  • InjuryAug 10, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED DOUBLE VISION, HYPEROPIA, AND DYSPHOTOPSIA. THE IOL WAS REMOVED IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 15199756 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page