Skip to content

Clareon CCWET6 (UDI 00380652456265)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Clareon Vivity Toric UVA · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon (1142)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652456265), received between Apr 12, 2023 and Jul 25, 2023 — classified as 2 injuries.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2

Patient problems

  • Visual Disturbances2
  • Visual Impairment2
  • Blurred Vision1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 25, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT WAS UNABLE TO DRIVE WITH CURRENT VISION . THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED FOR ANOTHER LENS MODEL FOLLOWING THE INITIAL IMPLANT PROCEDURE. CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT WAS MORE ASTIGMATISM AFTER CLEAN LENS EXCHANGE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Visual Disturbances; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 17389036 ↗
  • InjuryApr 12, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED BLURRY VISION IN THE RIGHT EYE. THE CLINICAL REASON WAS DYSPHOTOPSIA. THE INTRAOCULAR LENS WAS EXPLANTED AND EXCHANGED IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE FOR ATIOL (ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INTRAOCULAR LENS) LENS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED AND RECEIVED STATED THAT PATIENT HAD DYSPHOTOPSIA AND DECREASED CONTRAST SENSITIVITY AND WAS NOT HAPPY WITH DISTANCE VISION AND THERE WAS NO IMPROVEMENT WITH REFRACTION. THE PATIENT ISSUE HAS BEEN RESOLVED AFTER LENS EXCHANGE. THE PATIENT WAS NOT HOSPITALIZED AND THE SURGEON PROGNOSIS WAS GOOD.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Disturbances; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 16724235 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page