Skip to content

Clareon CCWET6 (UDI 00380652456449)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Clareon Vivity Toric UVA · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon (1142)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00380652456449), received between Oct 30, 2024 and Oct 30, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • Blurred Vision1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 30, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INITIAL IMPLANT PROCEDURE, LENS WAS NOT STRONG ENOUGH SO THE SURGEON SCHEDULED HIM FOR A LENS EXCHANGE WHEN HE HAD ANOTHER LENS IMPLANTED, HE WAS STILL HAD ISSUES FOCUSING ON STREET SIGNS. HIS SURGEON SCHEDULED HIM FOR A LASER-ASSISTED IN SITU KERATOMILEUSIS (LASIK) PROCEDURE RIGHT EYE (OD). HIS VISION STILL WAS NOT A SHARP AS HE WANTED SO HIS SURGEON DID ANOTHER LASIK PROCEDURE. HE STILL WAS NOT HAPPY WITH THE RESULT, SO THE SURGEON DID ONE MORE LASIK TREATMENT. THE REPORTER WAS TOLD TO HAVE HIS LEFT EYE TREATED WITH IOL AND THE EYES SHOULD WORK TOGETHER. CONSUMER WAS NERVOUS TO HAVE SURGERY ON HIS LEFT EYE BECAUSE NOW, ITS THE GOOD EYE. HE WAS GOING TO HAVE A 2ND OPINION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED. THERE ARE TWO MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS COMPLAINT. THIS REPORT IS 1 OF 2.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 20568891 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page