Clareon CCWTT3 (UDI 00380652457330)Recalls & reported problems
Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Clareon PanOptix Toric UVA · Class 3 · Implant
All models of Clareon (1142)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652457330), received between Mar 5, 2024 and Mar 30, 2026 — classified as 5 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Twisted/Bent” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem5
- Material Twisted/Bent1
Patient problems
- Blurred Vision2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Visual Disturbances2
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
- Insufficient Information1
- Intraocular Pressure Increased1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 30, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A NONHEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT AFTER THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION SURGERY, THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE DUE TO UNKNOWN ISSUE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED AND RECEIVED STATING THAT THE LENS WAS EXCHANGED FOR A NON COMPANY LENS. NO PATIENT HARM AND THE SURGEONS PROGNOSIS WAS NOTED AS GOOD.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24723822 ↗MalfunctionJul 30, 2025Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent
A NURSE REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, UPON LOADING LENS IT WAS NOTED THAT ONE OF THE HAPTICS WAS MALFORMED/DISTORTED. A NEW LENS WAS IMPLANTED AND COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE ON THE SAME DAY. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED; THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22662947 ↗InjuryJul 23, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A CONSUMER REPORTED THAT AFTER THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT HAD EXPERIENCED VERY BLURRY VISION. THE BLURRINESS PERSISTED FOR ABOUT THREE WEEKS UNTIL HER EYE PRESSURE RETURNED TO 14. THE CONSUMER BELIEVED THAT, DUE TO THE MISSHAPEN CORNEA, THE 17.5-DIOPTER LENS WAS THE WRONG STRENGTH. THE PATIENT REQUIRED 3.75-DIOPTER READING GLASSES, 2-DIOPTER GLASSES FOR COMPUTER USE, AND 1-DIOPTER GLASSES FOR DRIVING. THE PATIENT HAD A GOOD OUTCOME AFTER SURGERY, HOWEVER WAS DUE FOR A (YTTRIUM ALUMINUM GARNET) YAG LASER CAPSULOTOMY IN ORDER TO OPTIMIZE THE LENS OUTCOME WHICH WAS ORDERED BY THE SURGEON IN (B)(6) 2024 AT A POSTOPERATIVE VISIT THE PATIENT HAD SCHEDULED THE YAG PROCEDURE FOR (B)(6) 2024 BUT THEN CANCELED IT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED HOWEVER NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Intraocular Pressure Increased
MAUDE report 22577922 ↗InjuryFeb 6, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED WITH BLURRY VISION AT ALL DISTANCES AND GLARE. THE LENS WAS EXCHANGED FOR ANOTHER LENS MODEL 01 MONTH 05 DAYS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT WAS MENTIONED AS VISION AND BEST CORRECTED ACUITY DECREASED WITH COMPANY LENS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED STATING THAT THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Insufficient Information; Visual Disturbances
MAUDE report 21321794 ↗InjuryJan 29, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING CATARACT SURGERY WITH INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, PATIENT EXPERIENCED GLARE AND VISUAL DISTORTION, HALOS AND NEGATIVE DYSPHOTOPSIA. THE LENS WAS EXCHANGED FOR AN UNKNOWN ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INTRAOCULAR LENS (ATIOL) AFTER THE INITIAL IMPLANT PROCEDURE. THE CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANTATION WAS MECHANICAL COMPLICATION WITH PROSTHETIC LENS, NEGATIVE DYSPHOTOPSIA SIGNIFICANT GLARE AND HALOS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Visual Disturbances
MAUDE report 21265661 ↗InjuryMar 5, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A NON HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT DOES NOT LIKE THE MULTIFOCAL LENS. HENCE THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. THE CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT WAS PATIENT UNHAPPY WITH THE MULTIFOCAL LENS.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 18835871 ↗
Other intraocular lens devices
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens146 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens145 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens144 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens139 reports
- TECNIS SIMPLICITY DIB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens1 recall81 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens129 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens127 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens126 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page