Skip to content

Clareon CCWTT4 (UDI 00380652457811)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Clareon PanOptix Toric UVA · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon (1142)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652457811), received between Apr 18, 2023 and Jan 7, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Crack” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Crack1

Patient problems

  • Blurred Vision2
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Visual Disturbances1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 7, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED WITH GLARE. THE LENS WAS EXCHANGED FOR ANOTHER LENS MODEL 08 MONTHS 21 DAYS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT WAS MENTIONED AS COULD NOT SEE AT DISTANCE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 21091004 ↗
  • InjuryApr 15, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT WAS BOTHERED BY NEAR VISION. THE LENS WAS EXCHANGED FOR ANOTHER LENS MODEL 08 MONTHS 06 DAYS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND STATED THAT, THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 19104358 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 18, 2023Crack; Crack

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING THE INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANT PROCEDURE THE SURGEON NOTICED CRACKS IN LENS NEAR THE HAPTICS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED AND STATED THAT TECH RECEIVED THE LENS IT LOOKED OK AND LOADED PROPERLY. THE SURGEON PLACED IT IN THE EYE AND NOTICED THE CUTS AT THE TOP. HE THEN TOOK THE LENS OUT. THE SCHEDULED PROCESSES WAS COMPLETED THE SAME DAY. THERE WAS PATIENT CONTACT NOTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 16762128 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page