Skip to content

Clareon CCWTT4 (UDI 00380652457880)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Clareon PanOptix Toric UVA · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon (1142)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652457880), received between Oct 12, 2022 and Nov 21, 2025 — classified as 5 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Scratched Material” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 2 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 2 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem5
  • Scratched Material2

Patient problems

  • Blurred Vision4
  • Visual Disturbances2
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 21, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT VISION WAS NOT CLEAR. THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INTRAOCULAR LENSES (ATIOL) MODEL LENS 5 MONTHS 4 WEEKS 1 DAY FOLLOWING THE INITIAL IMPLANT PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision

    MAUDE report 23618884 ↗
  • InjuryNov 13, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NURSE REPORTED THAT AFTER INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION, THE PATIENT'S VISION WAS NOT AS EXPECTED. THE LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED, BUT NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 23540406 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 29, 2025Scratched Material; Scratched Material

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE LENS WAS SCRATCHED DURING LOADING WITH NO PATIENT CONTACT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21926260 ↗
  • InjuryApr 23, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON-HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED GLARE AND VISION DECREASED. THE LENS WAS EXCHANGED FOR ANOTHER LENS MODEL IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT WAS MENTIONED AS DYSPHOTOPSIA SECONDARY TO IOL. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED. THERE ARE TWO MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RIGHT EYE.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 21888656 ↗
  • InjuryOct 30, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED STARBURSTS WHEN DRIVING AT NIGHT AND BLURRY VISION. THE LENS WAS EXCHANGED FOR ANOTHER LENS MODEL 02 MONTHS 15 DAYS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED, PATIENT EXPERIENCED BLURRED VISION UNCORRECTABLE BY REFRACTION. IN THE SURGEON¿S OPINION MULTIFOCAL TECHNOLOGY CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENTS AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 20571073 ↗
  • InjuryMar 11, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED BLURRY DISTANCE VISION AND BLURRY VISION WHEN READING. THE LENS WAS EXCHANGED FOR ANOTHER LENS MODEL 06 MONTHS 20 DAYS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED AND STATED THAT THE PATIENT WAS NOT HOSPITALIZED FOR THE EVENT, PATIENT ISSUES RESOLVED AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision

    MAUDE report 18875271 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 12, 2022Scratched Material; Scratched Material

    A NURSE REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON NOTICED A SCRATCH ON THE LENS, LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH THE BACKUP LENS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15586253 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page