Clareon CCWTT4 (UDI 00380652457880)Recalls & reported problems
Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Clareon PanOptix Toric UVA · Class 3 · Implant
All models of Clareon (1142)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652457880), received between Oct 12, 2022 and Nov 21, 2025 — classified as 5 injuries, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Scratched Material” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem5
- Scratched Material2
Patient problems
- Blurred Vision4
- Visual Disturbances2
- Insufficient Information1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- Visual Impairment1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryNov 21, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT VISION WAS NOT CLEAR. THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INTRAOCULAR LENSES (ATIOL) MODEL LENS 5 MONTHS 4 WEEKS 1 DAY FOLLOWING THE INITIAL IMPLANT PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Blurred Vision
MAUDE report 23618884 ↗InjuryNov 13, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A NURSE REPORTED THAT AFTER INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION, THE PATIENT'S VISION WAS NOT AS EXPECTED. THE LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED, BUT NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Visual Impairment
MAUDE report 23540406 ↗MalfunctionApr 29, 2025Scratched Material; Scratched Material
A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE LENS WAS SCRATCHED DURING LOADING WITH NO PATIENT CONTACT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21926260 ↗InjuryApr 23, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A NON-HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED GLARE AND VISION DECREASED. THE LENS WAS EXCHANGED FOR ANOTHER LENS MODEL IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT WAS MENTIONED AS DYSPHOTOPSIA SECONDARY TO IOL. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED. THERE ARE TWO MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RIGHT EYE.
Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Disturbances
MAUDE report 21888656 ↗InjuryOct 30, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED STARBURSTS WHEN DRIVING AT NIGHT AND BLURRY VISION. THE LENS WAS EXCHANGED FOR ANOTHER LENS MODEL 02 MONTHS 15 DAYS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED, PATIENT EXPERIENCED BLURRED VISION UNCORRECTABLE BY REFRACTION. IN THE SURGEON¿S OPINION MULTIFOCAL TECHNOLOGY CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENTS AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM.
Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Disturbances
MAUDE report 20571073 ↗InjuryMar 11, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED BLURRY DISTANCE VISION AND BLURRY VISION WHEN READING. THE LENS WAS EXCHANGED FOR ANOTHER LENS MODEL 06 MONTHS 20 DAYS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED AND STATED THAT THE PATIENT WAS NOT HOSPITALIZED FOR THE EVENT, PATIENT ISSUES RESOLVED AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM.
Patient problems: Blurred Vision
MAUDE report 18875271 ↗MalfunctionOct 12, 2022Scratched Material; Scratched Material
A NURSE REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON NOTICED A SCRATCH ON THE LENS, LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH THE BACKUP LENS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 15586253 ↗
Other intraocular lens devices
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens146 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens145 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens144 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens139 reports
- TECNIS SIMPLICITY DIB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens1 recall81 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens129 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens127 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens126 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page