Skip to content

Clareon CCWTT5 (UDI 00380652458337)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Clareon PanOptix Toric UVA · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon (1142)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652458337), received between Mar 28, 2024 and Jun 25, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2

Patient problems

  • Blurred Vision2
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Glaucoma1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 25, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON-HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED WITH BLURRY/NOT CLEAR VISION. THE LENS WAS EXCHANGED FOR ANOTHER LENS MODEL 8 MONTHS 17 DAYS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT WAS MENTIONED AS MALADAPTION TO MULTI FOCAL IOL OPTICS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED, THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision

    MAUDE report 19603484 ↗
  • InjuryMar 28, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT AFTER INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT WAS INTOLERANT TO THE LENS. THE LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A MONOFOCAL LENS IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. THE CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT WERE MIOSIS AND NARROW ANGLES. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED AND RECEIVED. THE PATIENT ADDITIONALLY EXPERIENCED BLURRY VISION AT BOTH DISTANCE AND NEAR WITH THE INITIAL IMPLANT. EXPRESSING DISCONTENT WITH THE VISUAL ACUITY PROVIDED BY THE INITIAL IMPLANT, THE PATIENT REPORTED THAT NOTHING WAS CLEAR TO HIM. ACCORDING TO THE SURGEON'S OPINION, THE IOL DID NOT CONTRIBUTE TO THE PATIENT'S EXPERIENCES.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Blurred Vision; Glaucoma

    MAUDE report 18993658 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page